IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] RFC3449 & AccECN

Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Sun, 10 July 2022 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86430C159481 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 15:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UpPAF-W_0KOG for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 15:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu (mail-ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu [185.185.85.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E763C14F718 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 15:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=I0HFMhnte3LnaipcVNUuiRxxRHrii90MqzEflYieltk=; b=HFwlSQkOQlSSbEkaI1SleRh4wZ 1VtRc2oTH0vImDxA9UvJ45kLXclr1wZFkrBT/Gzp11EqfcCuEVQhFcY/BJeduoKPE8tePr4XQSajR +Hbc+hlxWKbBbkn6AZkUGl64fK8u5mz0AiHMN4Ukyk2BLwIpagxTE1xCHn/RpU2ptNauscHCqvwsy 2reebNOrgjj4az9GdXNeGlkWUtxzpb3H3ZAnnQcqHYXGQ2gqhVY/OMY4cX/5aGuEiW4akhOYVivd9 3KYkeHStLAhexsQml2iJQk51/8cQUAZIlQlaJGe0ZWvCwv6QUdUor0vXkF8OmB3wX/GFfauCSeDGg DPEVn0Yg==;
Received: from 67.153.238.178.in-addr.arpa ([178.238.153.67]:49796 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1oAfEC-0002q1-Ot; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 23:16:35 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------NrM1INodRsE1DzGBv8kCAd0u"
Message-ID: <bce19478-5ead-6dc0-a5e6-541b9f237e76@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 23:16:34 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-GB
To: "Gorry (erg)" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Richard Scheffenegger <rs.ietf@gmx.at>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <9f51a991-3d30-8911-bc20-6b54ebea0203@bobbriscoe.net> <4A3BA7DE-BB0F-4693-9D04-AFE94AB8D96D@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A3BA7DE-BB0F-4693-9D04-AFE94AB8D96D@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/hD9W-STuLv3Km04x0Cy1obgjApA>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] RFC3449 & AccECN
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 22:16:42 -0000

Gorry,

I can guess that what you intended was sthg like:

MY PRIOR PROPOSAL:
       In the worst case, when feeding back
       a run of packets that were all ECN-marked, the ACE field can wrap
       every 8 acknowledged packets.

YOUR PROBABLE PROPOSAL:
       In the worst case, in feedback about
       a run of received packets that were all ECN-marked.
       the ACE field will wrap every 8 acknowledged packets.



Bob


On 06/07/2022 17:30, Gorry (erg) wrote:
> I do think this is the correct direction with respect to How to handle 
> this. I don’t have any further requests on the approach, but I would 
> question whether the proposed text:
>
> /*feeding back**a run of packets/*
> *
> *
> *Is actually clear - is something more like*
> */**feed back about a received**run of packets /*
> *Clearer … you will know what reads best.*
> *
> *
> *Gorry *
> *
> *
>> On 6 Jul 2022, at 17:04, Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> wrote:
>>
>> feeding back a run of packets

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoehttp://bobbriscoe.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email