IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Updated SHA-2 AO draft

"Sujeet Nayak A (sua)" <sua@cisco.com> Thu, 29 January 2015 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sua@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129DE1A019B for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:55:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXwtfHd_dbU3 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C60A21A0151 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:55:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4986; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422528949; x=1423738549; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=/sZOvthGU7HMDQimgqAQRfZFbFfdm3oVPVJEBGlLr/w=; b=SflCZerdJ9UJw+2/zf51ZFy4BP8NeV/hkqDo6EXXYxq1VJRqGoh7JRbl VM5UGZzqEZW0HOVoeCP8Qqw+c8hCErKWxkIYAFXMK9eda3hhzpKM1zNDe bxfZn9meVJc7GsdeHHb9KoT+i3djbI4dFkJhWlzpj4cTDldmBCsvxC8ca A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CbBwAgEcpU/4kNJK1agkNDUlkEwm+BaYVxAoEeQwEBAQEBfYQMAQEBBHkQAgEIBA0DAQIoBzIUCQgCBA4FiCwN1XkBAQEBAQEBAQIBAQEBAQEBAQEBARePZw0EB4QpBY50g0uFV4EXNoJLh3iCeYM9IoNub4FEfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,485,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217";a="118619164"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2015 10:55:49 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0TAtno9008697 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:55:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.3]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:55:48 -0600
From: "Sujeet Nayak A (sua)" <sua@cisco.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Updated SHA-2 AO draft
Thread-Index: AQHP8nYrPM6bJff4oUqZ0Bc1WuqHwZzYQB4A
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:55:47 +0000
Message-ID: <D0F00E39.7EE64%sua@cisco.com>
References: <D07531AA.74A10%sua@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D07531AA.74A10%sua@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117
x-originating-ip: [10.142.108.96]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0F00E397EE64suaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/kO8cRNrrPWXHLyGkSEsYdDvgLLQ>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Updated SHA-2 AO draft
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:55:52 -0000

Hi,
Thanks again for all the valuable comments so far. Brian and myself have uploaded the next version (version 2)of the draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nayak-tcp-sha2-02

The change that has been made (wrt version 1):

  *   Last parah in section 4 has been added to accommodate the review comment on explicitly calling out options packing.

Please let me know if there are any more comments.

Regards,

Sujeet

From: sua <sua@cisco.com<mailto:sua@cisco.com>>
Date: Tuesday, 28 October 2014 11:42 AM
To: "tcpm@ietf.org<mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>" <tcpm@ietf.org<mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>>
Cc: "Brian Weis (bew)" <bew@cisco.com<mailto:bew@cisco.com>>
Subject: Updated SHA-2 AO draft

Hi,
Thanks everyone for your valuable review comments so far. Brian and myself have updated the draft to produce the next version.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nayak-tcp-sha2-01

Some of the high level changes made are:

  *   Because of TCP option space issue, SHA512 has been moved out of the draft (a note added in the "Security Consideration" for future support, when needed).
  *   Moved the motivation contents into the introduction section.
  *   Taken care of some of the RFC language related comments.

Pl. review and let me know your feedback. On the other hand, if there is a consensus that, the contents need to update RFC5926, and if that RFC allows such an update, then we are happy to work with Greg on it.

Regards,

Sujeet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email