IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Feedback on WG acceptance of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-01

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Thu, 30 April 2015 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC94B1ACDB8 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DyAVWDT1gilX for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx143.netapp.com (mx143.netapp.com [216.240.21.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C595F1ACE5B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,675,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="38876627"
Received: from hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.34]) by mx143-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2015 00:06:20 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:06:20 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::f07f:691d:89d:53b7%21]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.031; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:06:20 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] Feedback on WG acceptance of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-01
Thread-Index: AQHQgniiqREnpx5A60G89rjx0bjeqZ1lmLqA
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:06:20 +0000
Message-ID: <33E3613D-55E0-4213-BADD-0DFE7B5F8C17@netapp.com>
References: <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D16C939DA@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <f66ed0bbaeeb41faa8b41748969a4032@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <f66ed0bbaeeb41faa8b41748969a4032@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
x-originating-ip: [10.122.56.79]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <CFB051B8890A5F43B10B56C5AD94AF10@hq.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/lA2kBdoZt9ghwO3kzeCb08oiQWA>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Feedback on WG acceptance of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-01
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:06:41 -0000

On 2015-4-29, at 14:32, Scheffenegger, Richard <rs@netapp.com> wrote:
> I'm still in support, on standards track.

Me too, given that this has been the default CC on Linux for years now. What's the reason for Informational; that this was done outside of the IETF and therefore doesn't deserve PS? That seems a bit dogmatic given the amount of real world experience.

But: I'd rather see it published as Informational that not at all.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email