IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Feedback on WG acceptance of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-01

"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> Thu, 30 April 2015 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rs@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC611B2C7D for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xdTp9e581ou for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [216.240.21.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C19B1B2C83 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,677,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="39520180"
Received: from hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.36]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2015 07:46:17 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX05-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.38) by hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:46:17 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX05-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::29f7:3e3f:78c5:a0bc%21]) with mapi id 15.00.0995.031; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:46:17 -0700
From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] Feedback on WG acceptance of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-01
Thread-Index: AQHQgxQp01Djqlpmhk+8oiC1GTHuN51locaQ
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:46:16 +0000
Message-ID: <9dc614eb40cd416185a8f5cb1cd0f3ce@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
References: <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D16C939DA@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <f66ed0bbaeeb41faa8b41748969a4032@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com> <33E3613D-55E0-4213-BADD-0DFE7B5F8C17@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <33E3613D-55E0-4213-BADD-0DFE7B5F8C17@netapp.com>
Accept-Language: de-AT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.122.56.79]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/o2NQxJqdPJYXEUsWcJLBCsFi7vg>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Feedback on WG acceptance of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-01
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:51:20 -0000

Lars, Alex,

correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that the draft has been released by the original authors for community discussion and feedback, right? So if the mechanism can be improved, any feedback to that effect could be added even if it means that the draft does no longer match what is in Linux (iOS, BSD)...

At least that was the basis for me to support PS status...

Best regards,
  Richard



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eggert, Lars
> Sent: Donnerstag, 30. April 2015 09:06
> To: Scheffenegger, Richard
> Cc: Scharf, Michael (Michael); tcpm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [tcpm] Feedback on WG acceptance of draft-zimmermann-tcpm-
> cubic-01
> 
> On 2015-4-29, at 14:32, Scheffenegger, Richard <rs@netapp.com> wrote:
> > I'm still in support, on standards track.
> 
> Me too, given that this has been the default CC on Linux for years now.
> What's the reason for Informational; that this was done outside of the
> IETF and therefore doesn't deserve PS? That seems a bit dogmatic given the
> amount of real world experience.
> 
> But: I'd rather see it published as Informational that not at all.
> 
> Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email