Re: [tcpm] AD review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-antispoof-05.txt

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Mon, 29 January 2007 16:16 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBZBQ-00024j-RC; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:16:40 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBZBP-00024c-44 for tcpm@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:16:39 -0500
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBZBB-0000Up-E1 for tcpm@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:16:39 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (111.sub-75-214-105.myvzw.com [75.214.105.111]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0TGG6GI010843; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <45BE1DC5.6020101@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:16:05 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] AD review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-antispoof-05.txt
References: <20070118012440.GC1540@hut.isi.edu> <77BF57F4-215F-4015-971B-36335B975951@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <77BF57F4-215F-4015-971B-36335B975951@nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 41c17b4b16d1eedaa8395c26e9a251c4
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0662925063=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

Hi, all,

I received some detailed corrections from Alfred Hoenes, noting the
issues below, as well as the suggestion to include a sentence on NATs.

Would it be more useful to make these corrections before or after the WG
sends the document on? (and can they be done without yet another WGLC?)

Joe

Lars Eggert wrote:
> On 2007-1-18, at 3:24, ext Ted Faber wrote:
>> This WGLC will end 2 Feb 2007 - a little more than 2 weeks from now.
> 
> I did my AD review during WGLC to speed up things a bit.
> 
> Overall, this is a very solid document that is ready for publication.
> 
> There are some minor boilerplate and spelling/grammar issues. Since I
> know Joe uses Word, turn on spelling and grammar checks :-) If there are
> more substantial comments that would require a revision now, fix these
> nits, too, otherwise they can wait until AUTH48.
> 
>>    At 1 Mbps, 57,000 (40
>>    byte) RSTs would take over 50 minutes to transmit, and, as noted
>>    earlier, most current connections are fairly brief by comparison.
> 
>   57000*8*40 = 18,240,000 bits need 18.24 seconds with 1Mbps
> 
> Lars
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

-- 
----------------------------------------
Joe Touch
Sr. Network Engineer, USAF TSAT Space Segment

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm