Re: [tcpm] WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-antispoof-05.txt (Ends 2 Feb 2007)

[Joe Touch <[e-mail]>]

The following is a summary of feedback from the last call:

- Wes Eddy endorsed the doc

- Alfred Hoenes provided detailed input

	- numerous typos were addressed

	- sec 2.4 had an error, where the attack takes only 20 seconds
	for a 1Mbps link; this description was updated to indicate that
	such an attack is less likely primarily because of port
	randomization, and now cites Larsen/Gont's recent I-D

	- sec 5.2 AH was corrected from "deprecated" to
	"being phased out", and now cites 4301

	- requested addressing NATs
	a paragraph was appended to the security considerations section

- Lars Eggert provided input

	- also noticed the sec 2.4 error above

- Pekka Savola provided input

	- sec 3.2.1, paragraph 3 was reworded according to his
	suggested text on filtering

	- draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt was added to the
	references where BITW was discussed

- the document was updated with revised BCP 78 boilerplate

All the above modifications were confirmed as sufficient by the parties
above. The revised document, -06, has already been submitted to the I-D
repository (and passed IDnits). It should be available shortly; until
then, it is available at:
http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-antispoof-06.txt

Joe


Ted Faber wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0800, Ted Faber wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> As we mentioned in San Diego, the anti-spoof document is ready for a
>> second last call.  We're primarily checking to see that issues brought
>> up in the first WGLC have been addressed.  You can find much of that
>> discussion starting here:
>>
>> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg01890.html
>>
>> The draft is available from 
>>
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-antispoof-05.txt
>>
>> Comments (including positive ones, please) to the list.
>>
>> This WGLC will end 2 Feb 2007 - a little more than 2 weeks from now.
> 
> Just a reminder: this WGLC has one week left.  I've only seen one
> message about the draft.  Passing a WGLC requires some reaction from the
> group.  If you're interested in seeing this work done and believe that
> this document represents a reasonable consensus, please speak up.  And,
> of course, if you see problems with the draft, also speak up.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

-- 
----------------------------------------
Joe Touch
Sr. Network Engineer, USAF TSAT Space Segment

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm