IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] [Fwd: Confirmation for Auto-Post of I-D draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv]

gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk Mon, 16 December 2013 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE64C1ADE84 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:28:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aaZO10NKoUjE for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:28:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.204.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD741AD8EC for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:28:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.erg.abdn.ac.uk (blake.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.210.30]) by spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01CC12B42D4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:28:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from 212.159.18.54 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gorry) by www.erg.abdn.ac.uk with HTTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:28:16 -0000
Message-ID: <8f78ebda09f5e658aa0cd61a38019a88.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:28:16 -0000
From: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
To: tcpm@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Subject: [tcpm] [Fwd: Confirmation for Auto-Post of I-D draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv]
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:28:23 -0000

We've submitted a revised ID for new-cwv.

There are 2 main updates:

- The draft now firmly recommends the use of pacing. We will provide
performance data on pacing for the next IETF.

- The draft has a small amendment to the algorithm to ensure that the NVP
does not inhibit cwnd growth when a sender fully consumes the cwnd. There
was previously a corner case in the measurement of pipeACK when a flow
started or resumed that could result making newCWV more conservative than 
standard TCP (e.g. for a bulk flow). We think the correction is within the
original spirit of new CWV.

We'd welcome feedback on these or any other aspects.

Best wishes,

the new CWV authors

--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Hi,

The IETF datatracker draft submission service has received your draft
draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-04, and requires a
confirmation step in order to be able to complete the posting of
the draft.

Please follow this link to the page where you can confirm the posting:
Confirmation URL:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/56402/confirm/c575579feb585d58d82af80a319918630e8d0529/


Best regards,

	The IETF Secretariat
	through the draft submission service

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email