[tcpm] MPTCP Erratum
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Fri, 13 May 2022 21:36 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5498FC185B05 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dAQppct3xR8Z for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92F33C185B03 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com with SMTP id a127so9724682vsa.3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QN0YZgW0itYwbELT1tl3WjBW5SjzTBCcvp/h8PFFhCY=; b=HtngCz5T0n9ww84j0uOmvlAVIotWtXHk2oxk5IKzie5zXv3KaBnexxTryPkmTcKf/0 7blQWLUbKxWKUI0PLxRN2Lwo7aM50e99I8FQq+o5lemC0TmPs3Y/dtlx0ejMCJpnZ25z mnkqL30fABQ8vQpvHNzesT50wtzAsQPCNoITp3ILSc46clh+0PXf0yoVRbPCbU6VeRS/ O37QPwZQEYJz3YMn/bHk7IAsgVv+9Ci1v1NjDeOLACYst5o/c0mae01d7AhgUZKSo1wV 7TFt2qGdBZ02Vg8oc2eLarx5UXhHJHCO/lwub4dphWvsvbHqK3B6PQ4DQzfRKunXILiC Famg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QN0YZgW0itYwbELT1tl3WjBW5SjzTBCcvp/h8PFFhCY=; b=jFeJf9MW2aGS950nz5QhfQvEi6k6wwIs9z7HRmvzgbR0XuAoh+0UwW9+s6aYg5MSv7 AyEk9IJm6mDC/J7B7NuZA59DsVEETE8Kzw3U7jsTh6DZQzQ2d59cvkcDW6HQp0Q5DYoZ 6/EQ6KAerVP5usyQh4FYFKjb1ttR6ePwXjFEIV9t9pE2+QbzKliZphXfgh+UfN9XemVQ 1mcB84MUHc+32z9vRxICcNrC3t/VUtusY0LYNMQBqyVLQDkyvy1gr7egfPd8yffdS2+9 LB7cTqV7iDUTbdUhMKb7P9kz+dPt1Wc2/j8YtNNW5q1/oZ93XsajhiAWgaJtmZXD3b2W grvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5307hxEMKEPu+RNbJPUwZoKiunOqjrHTjpCZog76AIolq7KKegwP IasEReo285PlHAgNUEItPapU2U88LidclsCXScsP5ArvS63ssg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjai1jSFSP3dMvV5tsCvhwCTY22A4pKxl2Afp9AHtBStSFEzgQSoxQXpA7ocUL+oMtfbx3x4/OrSWwzmMIuDk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:160e:b0:32e:7daf:3e47 with SMTP id cu14-20020a056102160e00b0032e7daf3e47mr3416907vsb.61.1652477757232; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 14:35:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxR_rq+0DUQDb1vd5UOq6J9adKkXg8Qd=BkOB6Xs1uW6mQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b81af005deeb75d4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/vpQlzoZ4818YorH-j_KP2Wkk_xs>
Subject: [tcpm] MPTCP Erratum
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 21:36:02 -0000
Hello TCPM, Can someone in the weeds on MPTCP help us out with this erratum for RFC8684? https://www.rfc-editor.org/verify_errata_select.php?eid=6609 The questions are (1) Is this correct, and (2) If so, is it serious enough to fix right away, or wait for the bis? Thanks Martin
- [tcpm] MPTCP Erratum Martin Duke
- Re: [tcpm] MPTCP Erratum tuexen
- Re: [tcpm] MPTCP Erratum Martin Duke
- Re: [tcpm] MPTCP Erratum Martin Duke
- Re: [tcpm] MPTCP Erratum Yoshifumi Nishida