Re: [tcpm] Draft agenda for London

"Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 14 February 2014 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2271A0114 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:27:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCCxB4p1w2uy for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:27:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoemail1.alcatel.com (hoemail1.alcatel.com [192.160.6.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504321A00E4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:27:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by hoemail1.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s1E8RAZH020196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 02:27:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s1E8R96B024840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:27:09 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.146]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:27:09 +0100
From: "Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] Draft agenda for London
Thread-Index: Ac8onU43MlJ63km5QEm8icYA6VQUIgAbjpeAABD2zIAAAtDaqw==
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:27:08 +0000
Message-ID: <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D1E5729@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <655C07320163294895BBADA28372AF5D1E4294@FR712WXCHMBA15.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAK6E8=edWxGMG+zPTP9jTTDXF5G-B6JQpLikFW=wA+wCN7QvrA@mail.gmail.com>, <656a85613ad24cb8550f9954fd1f9c5b.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <656a85613ad24cb8550f9954fd1f9c5b.squirrel@www.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [155.132.188.47]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/wOv0aJ4M2J98IwqfXGOvM8zmock
Cc: "tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Draft agenda for London
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:27:19 -0000

Very valid question. I was told that the draft will be updated.

Some background: Given some interest in MPTCP, we thought that a technical discussion on tcpcrypt could make sense. However, due to additional WG conflicts, we realized that for this we actually need a second (very short) TCPM slot. Surprisingly, we then ended up with a much longer slot than what we asked for. As a result, and as noted earlier on this list, we actually have plenty of meeting time in London - more than we asked for. Now, since there was no shortage of time, we finally decided to approve the author's request of 60 min even if it significantly exceeds what TCPM is used to grant. So far, we also approved all other presentation requests with at least the requested time. Within the usual single TCPM slot, a 60 min request would not have been approved.

Having said this, the agenda is tentative, and feedback is welcome.

Michael

________________________________________
Von: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk [gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk]
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Februar 2014 08:38
Bis: Yuchung Cheng
Cc: Scharf, Michael (Michael); tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org; tcpm@ietf.org Extensions
Betreff: Re: [tcpm] Draft agenda for London

I think it would be good to understand why there is a 60 minute talk on
something where the text has not changed at all since the last meeting.

Gorry

> On Feb 13, 2014 1:24 AM, "Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <
> michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please find below the first draft for the TCPM agenda in London. Since
>> we
> received a request for an exceptionally long presentation, we decided to
> ask for a second TCPM time slot. We plan to discuss the WG drafts in the
> Thursday slot, while spending the Monday slot on individual submissions.
> Note that this is a tentative agenda and changes are still possible.
>>
>> Please let the chairs know if you have any suggestions or if we missed
> something.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Michael, Pasi, Yoshifumi
>>
>>
>>
>> ****** Draft Agenda ******
>>
>> TCPM meeting, IETF-89, London, UK
>>
>> Session 1: Monday, 0900-1130
>> ============================
>>
>> Individual Drafts
>> -----------------
>>
>> * Making TCP more Robust to Packet Reordering
>>   draft-zimmermann-tcpm-reordering-detection
>>   draft-zimmermann-tcpm-reordering-reaction
>>   Alexander Zimmermann
>>   30 min
>>
>> * Simpler and reordering resilient loss recovery
>>   (no draft)
>>   Yuchung Cheng
>>   20 min
>>
>> * tcpcrypt: the case for ubiquitous transport-level encryption
>>   draft-bittau-tcp-crypt
>>   Andrea Bittau
>>   60 min
> This draft was presented in Prague and Vancouver. Is this an update based
> on the feedbacks from prior meetings?
>
>
>>
>>
>> Session 2: Thursday, 1300-1500
>> ==============================
>>
>> WG Status
>> ---------
>>
>> * TCPM status
>>   Chairs
>>   10 min
>>
>> Working Group Items
>> -------------------
>>
>> * TCP Roadmap
>>   draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-rfc4614bis
>>   Alexander Zimmermann
>>   10 min
>>
>> * Updating TCP to support Rate-Limited Traffic
>>   draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-05
>>   Gorry Fairhurst
>>   20 min
>>
>> * TCP and SCTP RTO Restart
>>   draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-01
>>   Per Hurtig
>>   15 min
>>
>> * Problem Statement and Requirements for a More Accurate ECN Feedback
>>   draft-ietf-tcpm-accecn-reqs-05
>>   Mirja Kuehlewind
>>   5 min
>>
>>
>> Individual Drafts
>> -----------------
>>
>> * More Accurate ECN Feedback Solutions
>>   draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-accurate-ecn
>>   draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-accurate-ecn-option
>>   Richard Scheffenegger
>>   10 min
>>
>> * Timestamp negotiation and Clock exposure
>>   draft-trammell-tcpm-timestamp-interval
>>   draft-scheffenegger-tcpm-timestamp-negotiation
>>   Richard Scheffenegger
>>   15 min
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tcpm mailing list
>> tcpm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>