Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-00.txt

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Mon, 01 September 2014 11:07 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16191A0384 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 04:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3hMVfWmljDvh for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out5.uio.no (mail-out5.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC8231A038E for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 04:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx6.uio.no ([129.240.10.40]) by mail-out5.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1XOPRk-0001H0-Rp; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:06:52 +0200
Received: from boomerang.ifi.uio.no ([129.240.68.135]) by mail-mx6.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1XOPRj-0008BL-Ua; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:06:52 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3BDD277F-9129-45BD-B05C-5EE5583584E8"
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <D5F64228-AB9F-4D1F-B487-DBF17EDCE2A1@netapp.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:06:48 +0200
Message-Id: <342E46B0-B909-4B0E-9718-8C543A1EA3DE@ifi.uio.no>
References: <20140901103526.10291.7574.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D5F64228-AB9F-4D1F-B487-DBF17EDCE2A1@netapp.com>
To: "Zimmermann, Alexander" <Alexander.Zimmermann@netapp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 2 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 7 sum msgs/h 3 total rcpts 19752 max rcpts/h 44 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.1, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.06, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 0DF31C430E936DE670955D4A987021D74A65F99B
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.68.135 spam_score: -60 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 5929 max/h 17 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/zp6rVtXkHHhSyj3RJYmnxRZLp_8
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] New Version Notification for draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 11:07:06 -0000

Wow! As ICCRG co-chair I think that's great!

The history of ICCRG evaluation is still there, at:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG_cubic
It would be worthwhile going through the comments on this page and see if they've been addressed.

Cheers,
Michael


On 1. sep. 2014, at 12:51, Zimmermann, Alexander wrote:

> Hi TCPM WG,
> 
> after more or less 6 years after the last submission of CUBIC, we resubmit the
> draft today. The current submission is exactly the same as old draft from 2008.
> 
> In upcoming versions we plan to document current version of CUBIC implementation
> (may or may not including Hystart), so that it can be implemented by others
> without needing to refer to the Linux code.
> 
> Alex
> 
> Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
> 
>> Von: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>> Betreff: New Version Notification for draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-00.txt
>> Datum: 1. September 2014 12:35:26 MESZ
>> An: Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>, Lisong Xu <xu@unl.edu>, Injong Rhee <rhee@ncsu.edu>, Alexander Zimmermann <alexander.zimmermann@netapp.com>, Alexander Zimmermann <alexander.zimmermann@netapp.com>, Sangtae Ha <unknown-email-Sangtae-Ha@ietfa.amsl.com>, Lisong Xu <xu@unl.edu>, "Injong Rhee" <rhee@ncsu.edu>
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Alexander Zimmermann and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Name:		draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic
>> Revision:	00
>> Title:		CUBIC for Fast Long-Distance Networks
>> Document date:	2014-09-01
>> Group:		Individual Submission
>> Pages:		14
>> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-00.txt
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic/
>> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zimmermann-tcpm-cubic-00
>> 
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  CUBIC is an extension to the current TCP standards.  The protocol
>>  differs from the current TCP standards only in the congestion window
>>  adjustment function in the sender side.  In particular, it uses a
>>  cubic function instead of a linear window increase of the current TCP
>>  standards to improve scalability and stability under fast and long
>>  distance networks.  BIC-TCP, a predecessor of CUBIC, has been a
>>  default TCP adopted by Linux since year 2005 and has already been
>>  deployed globally and in use for several years by the Internet
>>  community at large.  CUBIC is using a similar window growth function
>>  as BIC-TCP and is designed to be less aggressive and fairer to TCP in
>>  bandwidth usage than BIC-TCP while maintaining the strengths of BIC-
>>  TCP such as stability, window scalability and RTT fairness.  Through
>>  extensive testing in various Internet scenarios, we believe that
>>  CUBIC is safe for deployment and testing in the global Internet.  The
>>  intent of this document is to provide the protocol specification of
>>  CUBIC for a third party implementation and solicit the community
>>  feedback through experimentation on the performance of CUBIC.  We
>>  expect this document to be eventually published as an experimental
>>  RFC.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm