[tcpPrague] Fwd: L4S - Low Latency Low Loss Scalable throughput at IETF-105 Montreal hackathon

Bob Briscoe <research@bobbriscoe.net> Tue, 16 July 2019 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <research@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tcpprague@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpprague@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7DB1200F7; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BxAwR2nAtkHa; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server.dnsblock1.com (server.dnsblock1.com [85.13.236.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FDFD120045; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Pe7e6asRk8/Ptaiu49J0959BVgTBuDsyHBQQ7X2UR5c=; b=eHAUBiMTogV30j5SCvXnZM5me 97STp9H/PuAOegSHkER8YnXcNMarpGqD8ZIEPs5zUR7mIeDhHHKq9XDwqyT/Q/uE7QdMT2UNuFnZ/ TC/mQpZRv9dZ7yDBnXcJKppBGp3ZrR+o6n78TS8w89ZnK59gOIu9oIkSxGG4ZI2Jd2DCSJQBWijcL twGcSwIr2KUoSqjRtZk67+7FRpaWrxIU7ki0NKqYgMLLVHVesJ+CyQVXDGKxI6SdWB6Vb2ywF6eqx pP9u+yj2AVqKqRkMEpD9rnKk8zlC/1CkvaL24srUx83gdoWQpz5Qg6QkGioT54ciSKOTAjPvmQuOk T6YFYRhHg==;
Received: from [31.185.128.123] (port=54770 helo=[192.168.0.6]) by server.dnsblock1.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <research@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1hnVk7-0000Tk-5X; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:16:15 +0100
References: <AM4PR07MB3459C7CC2AC5B767ADCCFF5CB9CE0@AM4PR07MB3459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: TCP Prague List <tcpPrague@ietf.org>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Bob Briscoe <research@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <AM4PR07MB3459C7CC2AC5B767ADCCFF5CB9CE0@AM4PR07MB3459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <7c0efa88-362e-9213-45d5-5d2864bd4cf1@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 23:16:14 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR07MB3459C7CC2AC5B767ADCCFF5CB9CE0@AM4PR07MB3459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------964BABF24D715F65860E42F3"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.dnsblock1.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.dnsblock1.com: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: server.dnsblock1.com: in@bobbriscoe.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpprague/IU2sy2rs2ikta5yVOkV16xfpE8U>
Subject: [tcpPrague] Fwd: L4S - Low Latency Low Loss Scalable throughput at IETF-105 Montreal hackathon
X-BeenThere: tcpprague@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To coordinate implementation and standardisation of TCP Prague across platforms. TCP Prague will be an evolution of DCTCP designed to live alongside other TCP variants and derivatives." <tcpprague.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpprague>, <mailto:tcpprague-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpprague/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpprague@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpprague-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpprague>, <mailto:tcpprague-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:16:20 -0000

FYI,



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	L4S - Low Latency Low Loss Scalable throughput at IETF-105 
Montreal hackathon
Date: 	Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:07:53 +0000
From: 	De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) 
<koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>
To: 	hackathon@ietf.org <hackathon@ietf.org>
CC: 	Bob Briscoe <research@bobbriscoe.net>, Tilmans, Olivier (Nokia - 
BE/Antwerp) <olivier.tilmans@nokia-bell-labs.com>



Hi all,

We'll be working again on L4S topics during the IETF-105 hackaton.

This time we also target interop testing and application testing:

If you have a client and server application that you want to 
improve/test when using L4S, you can try it out on our testbed.

If you have an implementation of a DualQ, or Prague compliant congestion 
control, we can test different interop scenarios.

Details and links to resources/supporting drafts are available at 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/105hackathon#L4S  and copied below.

See you in Montreal.

Koen.

L4S - Low Latency Low Loss Scalable throughput

* Champion(s)

   * Bob Briscoe (Independent) ietf at bobbriscoe dot net

   * Koen De Schepper (Nokia Bell Labs) koen.de_schepper at 
nokia-bell-labs dot com

* Project(s)

   * DualQ Coupled AQM: Compare, contrast & walk through implementations

   * TCP Prague: Fall-back to TCP-Friendly on detection of classic ECN 
bottleneck

   * L4S interop testing: How does your DualQ or Prague TCP/QUIC/... 
implementation work compared to others?

   * L4S Application testing: How is your application performing when 
using L4S/Prague? Does it benefit from lower queuing delay? How 
noticeable is the difference? Is it L4S ready, how to improve?

* Resources: L4S Landing page with links to repos, documentation, etc: 
​https://riteproject.eu/dctth/#code