IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: (with COMMENT)

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Wed, 02 October 2019 06:10 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF06120041; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 23:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=empxa71H; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=cL174EPS
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBrCcf7LNflF; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 23:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0042120026; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 23:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9025; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1569996656; x=1571206256; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=yhZHjnOBSz1t0KqA/l0O32FtxB2CjsiNQnlKmS23Ebw=; b=empxa71HFsku+q2ovg+BtpJQnd4fm240kGD2DRfSwNvLHxPK7uzTtluI Mr8YnVzhkqnhxiBHzNOTdFjaa/d4t5JcOfue2/K4U4B3ccfyjnInnJ0wR JLE887bNygg1cwUyah/0A6+VbnC64ijF2Yz5VgGeNH1PfZ8OjPYXaM8sF k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:rg48sRFCn9t1qocV4rJRIJ1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7IYmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4z1A3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNVcejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+efP0fioxH8lqX15+9Hb9Ok9QS47z
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CuAACgPpRd/4MNJK1mGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEMAgEBAQGBZ4EcL1ADbVYgBAsqhCKDRwOKYYI3kzyEYIJSA1QJAQEBDAEBJQgCAQGEQAIXghsjOBMCAwkBAQQBAQECAQUEbYUtDIVMAgEDEhEdAQE3AQ8CAQhCAgICMBoLAgQOJ4MAAYEdTQMdAQIMpBMCgTiIYXWBMoJ9AQEFhQYYghcDBoE0jA4YgUA/gTgME4JMPoJhAQECAYILgmAygiaPMDeFL5gTCoIihwaOCxuZOYNAkn+RDQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSKBWHAVZQGCQVAQFIFPOIM7hRSFP3QBgSiQSgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,573,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="634398398"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 02 Oct 2019 06:10:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (xch-rcd-007.cisco.com [173.37.102.17]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x926Asf4006311 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 06:10:54 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 01:10:53 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 02:10:52 -0400
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 02:10:52 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=I4uG+srTkYAxqex/Bno4eMvnEVSS3/d3CCPuDOt410NJMPmST/O7kxncG+aJqDjablf4HjPaCTXczIj6CuzedNj/GYmVoQmPaC50P7nYgND7pAyGkiHcMOGol/CYvUKTw0uia3qwozwjW8S+6w3yCG6vq3qOg3SFNO+79mqGEzx9J85C0VKK2sXTOfi6wd6NNvv7N8XxuakBYA4dlsm1cKj1eo/ZUfZPHdyPouEy3tc3pI/KVgftfrsCVkmW+atIE5ShxSmaoEFsHQr3SUXt6eF6XN4x7HqCjUZ+d+QS2pryVQVtyIni67PfkP1SQAxYD1sFm8Njce8/EoqcxmPTJw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yhZHjnOBSz1t0KqA/l0O32FtxB2CjsiNQnlKmS23Ebw=; b=irJF+JMVOu+30WrELH0KbXUhIQn30fmb+BpbMM9VZiOLPulpyoim95tzT4sUVlWjOcplbn/9cbiME7SjXYmquR6UMD5kKnLOPO7arE7RcB+3fRmR2rhZ16E/HXoaBLyM+MhmqJnU0ojcN5CfYS119LV0uxpd1ez8/rF3+pXPKYw5Xezx7dWtuuoqPCnhzSfwcOdNFTyyfigqf5MimZ/WaZpmvDwaxqUykQEAJjN7DqX9omumBHksjpFxdDzIIP8HmStm0vK1wcXz0Wft6U2RS1d9UUnGhkMtmFSxa4E4wRyIYlmcqxgt49FDaGpoZ+EoNWv9vvrjdaolzlC+9Bws3A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yhZHjnOBSz1t0KqA/l0O32FtxB2CjsiNQnlKmS23Ebw=; b=cL174EPSRpBq662PTmA36XctlPVbE3AlRn2SL78JkLZcsVA/Po0alzjGhUBw1DfScctFLJ+31IgpjV7DxdtP2oi/IEg1A5Z3ceojoQiIf8HHcoDuUe3iNa/C0tmGOsvSPkhxwrSxxKJ98VsqIMW6t5K3qj1Jcjv8/Nq8/cYRB9E=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.210) by MN2PR11MB3645.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.254.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.17; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 06:10:51 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e4f8:d335:c018:c62a]) by MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e4f8:d335:c018:c62a%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.022; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 06:10:51 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVeGyerKleTI6xBk+q01XOxoyI96dHAPQA
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 06:10:51 +0000
Message-ID: <C7B798E6-F8DF-4164-8320-9949F623CE91@cisco.com>
References: <50053823-8854-4528-AD53-F88F2C95A78C@tsinghua.org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <50053823-8854-4528-AD53-F88F2C95A78C@tsinghua.org.cn>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1d.0.190908
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:a102:1062:9772:4dbb]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9e318fb6-bbee-43e4-f80f-08d746ff46d5
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3645:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB36458E5BD737782ABBB05FBBA99C0@MN2PR11MB3645.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0178184651
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(376002)(346002)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(52314003)(199004)(189003)(99286004)(25786009)(14454004)(4326008)(256004)(33656002)(486006)(2616005)(476003)(46003)(6916009)(236005)(66556008)(86362001)(66946007)(6116002)(66476007)(478600001)(76116006)(966005)(64756008)(66446008)(446003)(91956017)(6512007)(2906002)(6246003)(11346002)(229853002)(71190400001)(58126008)(71200400001)(5660300002)(54906003)(606006)(6436002)(6306002)(81166006)(81156014)(76176011)(7736002)(6506007)(54896002)(102836004)(36756003)(6486002)(224303003)(186003)(8936002)(316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3645; H:MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: hgnx9uQphb7eruo0oY6HvMb2KRDQEKEelNVkQlXzFctcpWUTkUpYGLns5/TiMZqzF11P8uJbxFJ9Pvmnpe0XZIFBObxO0sE+Z9kjaTV48XJxlXp3oPt1LhA91l5b5lCvHSKXYuQrq1MFGmItw/vDlTqFfw/1vCOEZM6M+pYPvC30GjwJ2NekS4/EK/T6mBGK3FZpHsNZTU3z1HHxMdZup9MjjqaHPh3uIpuHqcGrcxvi5nSzUm2LThPCMw51Taz4XPPlylx0NZ6sMPfp07w8eJI8DUpwIWF7xwqtzmJJ005Aca3OVgd3SY1lInavkpxN8TaPeqZKW2TnX2HZJYM3DhQgLXp3/I/FGRHL/0ljWz2F0HOw/vo4ykeU1xhPZvIjurXZE74r4qTcaEd/m2FafEOE3tgp/0FO3B9VaC4HNgCvImUU+NttqQzVSTmJNb1XoJl4oJBIf94zgnCEyKajiA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7B798E6F8DF416483209949F623CE91ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9e318fb6-bbee-43e4-f80f-08d746ff46d5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Oct 2019 06:10:51.3807 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Dtk3frFNwHz6eEiI8ntP1QSuyWYuapl5Gv9zulWmea6/K5Xx3rej2okK+MjUuM+AdlviA6hRYZo9K3/gYXV6VQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3645
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.17, xch-rcd-007.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/-Oj-X-JGYy8ul49bDW29lotCrIA>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Éric Vyncke's Abstain on draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 06:10:59 -0000

Aijun Wang

Thank you for the added pieces of information.

1. OSPF or ISIS will not influence the simulation results, as they are all based on Dijkstra algorithm.
2. The topology is generated in random manner under the rule described in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09#section-4.2. That is, the core nodes are connected in full mesh and the edge connects the core in random links. We have tried several different topology and the results are similar.
3. We will try to use the new XML2RFC format for the SVG graph in next version if necessary. Anyway, the reader can get the impressive concept by comparison the results described in section 4.4 and 4.5


  1.  Indeed this was my guess, but, worth explaining the obvious in the document
  2.  The ‘random’ link from edge to core is that part that bothers me. Perhaps worth stating that you run the simulation multiple times on several topologies with similar results? And perhaps display the confidence interval
  3.  Up to you :-)

Regards

-éric

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email