IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 16 June 2020 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9D73A00B0; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xbTbPn8bxGCI; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4263A00C0; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 13:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 05GKYJgK023765; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:34:19 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9912203B; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:34:19 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39DEF2203A; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:34:19 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([84.93.26.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 05GKYINY030883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:34:18 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Vishnu Pavan Beeram' <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CA+YzgTt3fWp7FJ=VchzWGChxcSq6GYNuwseM1zJqByxm9CKKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTt3fWp7FJ=VchzWGChxcSq6GYNuwseM1zJqByxm9CKKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:34:16 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <038201d6441d$819d7a50$84d86ef0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0383_01D64425.E3642C40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQF8mBxKPsHsWejWq0Xf7Uh+PFlHFKmPCZgA
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.93.26.18
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25486.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--23.127-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--23.127-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25486.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--23.127000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: nI1cAR4k0HbxIbpQ8BhdbMZLM5/LTRf/Igt1z4icQSsZSz1vvG+0mnQ7 c/s1Enkf8vwsrbfwnUQutduMdPdCI05lTrFAyg+XPbhB/I/n35EO9z+P2gwiBbQnfFdSRlndRxX iUeIw4hiN5ha5hzu599lg7WZ5/0fFJda7ktb7ayVQ+S0N05fR+91hWsVVuzNohMZOnOKs8fJsf8 yF/UpAHjOzCS2XG/urKZSM3+4vRP6ChM1yASPXeLIGMNfiwa5NzqP/yfxANUErhioeAJKilUqs0 cD/BUNxXIdo/uW4MA3UtfnAqjADHca6K1va4FFzvHKClHGjjr0HmzHO3TfA+E9KC+PgcNRUMraJ 67wznLG4ZfkBlKsszalHZMI8Kttx1MCvDCsNTi/vVbHa5Rs8t0OvwxWboMrdu/zUE1SNSPnMRUM adz4R8pqEb+LwlrVjt1gVV8hFpdLvOC1QV7aBzlnAtIGDGCFo+eBf9ovw8I0j0vSXSt1uP24GPE MJeKPO1WiqfklBHDv8LO5wKi8YUnHo2p42VhyY5rnnDTmVbKr8Xh935PYSDpd9j+WYn72GFxa3U rO1/9tUsBrwpfAq3hQAXi4Ga9GRHxPMjOKY7A+DGx/OQ1GV8gM5kYUazKEVsOzOncrmCoPnb9ku vyvyvSgXvS9wchJwtn5UzIDmcekuSb1UhB+cOFQ8ErLa3uZc
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/1M_GfnePeSmf8VRNuYNLd0Bl99Q>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:34:28 -0000

Yes/support

 

Hopefully it will come as no surprise that I think it is a good idea to adopt this document.

 

When the Design Team was set up, it was specifically tasked to get a bis into some basic shape ready for adoption, and then to hand over to the working group.

 

Progress has been slow and there is clearly more work to be done, but I think we now have a structure (including some empty sections) and rationalised text that gives a stable base for the working group. Furthermore, I would hope that, since the working group seemed to agree that the work needed to be done, having the draft adopted might lead to a little more involvement in generating and reviewing text.

 

If not adopted, I think I would continue with the draft for a while longer, and would hope that the Design Team members would also help.

 

Best,

Adrian

 

From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Sent: 16 June 2020 18:39
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis

 

All,

This is start of a two week poll on making
draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11 a TEAS working group document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends June 30th.

Thanks,
Pavan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email