Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 30 June 2020 14:45 UTC
Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362E43A0A6A; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IaA1-etzUpwa; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8223A0A69; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id k6so17917254ili.6; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fErh+fPI/C7QDcEYiZGW0SR07D87oCvZy3XgHPXMLzY=; b=ASHOrgBMuXoM4j8asWVptE32ls4my0akb98zej1EUTGlL7JqrJTS21TFCexOq/Xw5p cm/pgEBE/k25qx9W02tJKvH6krXn8umZxqG3eZrXOIQ0tzQ+qZhki73p8SjMoGxJLa80 6BLab6kZQM6JfrKO5ptpgAFyyDMFbeS6YvOIjO3Hb+lzsM54XQ/tdmEztdJviEd8zyJm AnB1pkYhLyPHUwbS7sj7W1/ud03Od3Vo+E5mmjHs31TMo5mlhgchwZ066eyh8ACv8Vsb eqHqr8/G7VEpOunT5BYBCRi2cQRvC7/x1CYMbDXcC3gP44mm/KDmdfXsQzGTyPGf2Px0 41tw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fErh+fPI/C7QDcEYiZGW0SR07D87oCvZy3XgHPXMLzY=; b=A9i3ODeJaB0gE7vOazRbn/91+VN9MHt93etvsQ0NYAc9NiPQQHLYUEEYFJz+JubODn D+8TvUww7z+pte8MTqz8ezBGUtbFax4puokBCTYKKu/xgdg0IDfdrjEddOkPvVeCO50V CS1ZURiDPO5QUjttRKulNoB9th97ZIv6RScx/sW2mBpcmMlHYjiI4b7bzv+QJ92bf7+O YU/pGyoGBELkqSZikDSyQs6whsdc1+Lwv1NpY3QQ2Z1FcjWBwboMcK+IB+/UgsX8FVZt /iFTSu4OBbFvqFybnGpUW6EYyePW/UQOAYAzGUPFM5G/VQnomndJmL6VPrMWeCP2qfJk c8rg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iBMZI3lOmsZAQvTZmOUlq4mab3PJEUgPXLWWSJW+AiRzAX5Pb Fh1muDPlUVsLCywOvoO0+4vCs18q7GiWzKhFhos=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUdE3WYjA8D3bFQomDqedsQESPPtHgtR6Zz0fonRhmGJUp/HoGajVBVRcJ2CdBpXckbtCbzKHr7fiyp6TAzUQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:cb03:: with SMTP id s3mr2959384ilo.1.1593528313445; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTt3fWp7FJ=VchzWGChxcSq6GYNuwseM1zJqByxm9CKKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTt3fWp7FJ=VchzWGChxcSq6GYNuwseM1zJqByxm9CKKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:14:36 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6pgMzE8nsqVewxAAxmNu1S=myJbS-27hpjQwJOBFd6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/uKqNd_Zm0xwjAtGV03VcdgK-3Yc>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:45:24 -0000
Hi, Thanks to Adrian & DT for this work! I wanted to do a substantial review of the I-D but it looks like that has to wait for a later date :) I managed to skim through it focusing on the changes and caught nothing that should impede the adoption of this work. I would have liked to see a section listing changes since RFC 3272 (but not sure how practical that is). The diff-tool [1] was somewhat useful. Two random points - = - Query: In section 1.2 - The key elements required in any TE solution are: 1. Policy 2. Path steering 3. Resource management Does that mean any solution that just does 1 and 2 and doesn't do 3 is not TE? Would SR-Policy and BIER-Tree engineering fall under that? Note that we have SR-MPLS covered (rightfully so) in Section 4.1.14 under IETF techniques. I am wondering if partial-TE is a thing? = - Section 4.1.3, this needs to be updated - A number of IETF working groups have been engaged in activities related to the RSVP protocol. These include the original RSVP working group, the MPLS working group, the Resource Allocation Protocol working group, and the Policy Framework working group. = Thanks! Dhruv [1] https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc3272&url2=draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11 On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:09 PM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11 a TEAS working group document. > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not > support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the > document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd > like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > The poll ends June 30th. > > Thanks, > Pavan > _______________________________________________ > Teas mailing list > Teas@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
- [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Jeff Tantsura
- [Teas] 答复: WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Luis M. Contreras
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Aihua Guo
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Lizhenbin
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Italo Busi
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Khasanov Boris
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Dieter Beller
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dt-teas-rfc32… Adrian Farrel