IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: (with COMMENT)

Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn> Thu, 03 October 2019 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18241208FD; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8zpAuAUPskp0; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74192120019; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.218:41177.1921218654
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-18.136.235.223?logid-9A2CE0BE291F48EA9001DCCF138A88CC (unknown [172.18.0.218]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 5159E28008B; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 21:48:11 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040164@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.218]) by App0025 with ESMTP id 9A2CE0BE291F48EA9001DCCF138A88CC for teas-chairs@ietf.org; Thu Oct 3 21:48:18 2019
X-Transaction-ID: 9A2CE0BE291F48EA9001DCCF138A88CC
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.218
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 21:48:06 +0800
Message-Id: <49E1748F-AF9D-49C0-BA65-CB0087B00942@chinatelecom.cn>
References: <157010883408.16164.106194701780959617.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, lberger@labn.net, teas-chairs@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <157010883408.16164.106194701780959617.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A577)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/5AhXfix1Im-PefKrksDvijK57_4>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:48:29 -0000

Hi, Barry:
I have replied several times for this incomplete impressions for this draft.
It is NOT the republication of part of the academic paper as one RFC. The simulation results just for reference for the additional gain of central control under the global view.
I don’t know why the reviewers not considering the main purposes of this draft that I reiterated several times.
Is it acceptable that we drop out of the simulation results then?

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

> On Oct 3, 2019, at 21:20, Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: Abstain
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In light of Roman's comments about the academic paper, I agree and join in the
> "Abstain" group.  It would be better just to have the other documents refer to
> the academic paper, rather than to republish a portion of that paper in the RFC
> series.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email