Re: [Teas] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: (with COMMENT)

Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn> Thu, 03 October 2019 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B5412090D; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FktBZ3aCusbc; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.223]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E3B12090B; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 06:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.48:21675.559241253
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-18.136.235.223?logid-E10B24B01BBD4321BCED1AF684B51674 (unknown [172.18.0.48]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id CFC86280098; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 21:57:54 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040164@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.48]) by App0024 with ESMTP id E10B24B01BBD4321BCED1AF684B51674 for teas-chairs@ietf.org; Thu Oct 3 21:58:04 2019
X-Transaction-ID: E10B24B01BBD4321BCED1AF684B51674
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.48
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-72EDDA8D-E124-472A-8017-939AAA0039CE"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 21:57:37 +0800
Message-Id: <FD452E50-4D85-4E1E-9A84-6316B33056C8@chinatelecom.cn>
References: <49E1748F-AF9D-49C0-BA65-CB0087B00942@chinatelecom.cn>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, teas-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, teas@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <49E1748F-AF9D-49C0-BA65-CB0087B00942@chinatelecom.cn>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A577)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/9hyFtAdtPU4HfEASqv1OR46e0tw>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:58:11 -0000

Hi, Barry:
Wish the response to Roman at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/IgJH9EZb0I9nx4TyaGEBROEiGos  can convince you for the future vote.
Mores comments are welcome.

Thanks in advance.

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

> On Oct 3, 2019, at 21:48, Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Barry:
> I have replied several times for this incomplete impressions for this draft.
> It is NOT the republication of part of the academic paper as one RFC. The simulation results just for reference for the additional gain of central control under the global view.
> I don’t know why the reviewers not considering the main purposes of this draft that I reiterated several times.
> Is it acceptable that we drop out of the simulation results then?
> 
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
> 
>> On Oct 3, 2019, at 21:20, Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: Abstain
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> In light of Roman's comments about the academic paper, I agree and join in the
>> "Abstain" group.  It would be better just to have the other documents refer to
>> the academic paper, rather than to republish a portion of that paper in the RFC
>> series.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Teas mailing list
>> Teas@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas