[Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-21: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 12 June 2019 01:35 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A931201A3; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, teas-chairs@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, teas@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.97.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <156030332758.5903.11787427451647585397.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:35:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/6DikSFHdDgH2juio5prI2BSjJFs>
Subject: [Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 01:35:35 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-21: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Section 4.2. Per “The data model proposed in this document can be used to retrieve/represent/manipulate the customized TE Topology depicted in Figure 8b” this statement struck me as odd because aren’t all of the topologies depicted here supported with the modeling language? (2) Section 4.2. Per “Although an authorized client MAY receive a TE topology with the client ID field matching some other client”, why would this happen? Couldn’t this potentially leak customized TE information across clients? (3) Section 5.9. Per “When two or more templates specify values for the same configuration field, the value from the template with the highest priority is used”, is the highest priority 0 or 65535 (since priority is a uint16)? The text doesn’t indicate whether the highest priority is a largest or smallest number. (4) Editorial Nits -- Section 3.4. Missing word. s/3.3/Section 3.3/ -- Section 4.2. Typo. s/-connectivit-/-connectivity-/ -- Section 4.2. Editorial. Why does “single-abstract-node-with-connectivit –matrix topology” use hyphens and “border_nodes_connected_via_mesh_of_abstract_links topology” use an underscore? -- Section 4.2. Typo. s/Although a/Although an/ -- Section 5.6. Typo. s/cooresponding/corresponding/
- [Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-… Xufeng Liu