[Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

[Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]>]

Forwarding to the mailing list for the record.

 

Adrian

 

From: Gert Grammel <[e-mail]> 
Sent: 13 May 2022 13:25
To: [e-mail]; 'Lou Berger' <[e-mail]>; 'Loa Andersson'
<[e-mail]>; 'Boris Hassanov' <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Boris Khasanov' <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

 

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

 

Best

 

Gert

 

From: Adrian Farrel <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Date: Friday, 13. May 2022 at 13:39
To: Gert Grammel <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >, 'Lou
Berger' <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >, 'Loa Andersson'
<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >, 'Boris Hassanov' <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: 'Boris Khasanov' <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >, [e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]>  <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

 

Hi Gert, Lou, Loa, Boris,

 

Still looking for IPR responses from you for this draft.

 

Thanks,

Adrian

 

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> > 
Sent: 06 May 2022 18:02
To: Adrian Farrel <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Gert
Grammel <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Loa Andersson
<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Xufeng Liu <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; Lou Berger <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; Daniel King <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; [e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> ; Kiran Makhijani <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; [e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> 
Cc: TEAS WG <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; TEAS WG Chairs
<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

 

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/
IntellectualProperty__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FTluGxGz_IP0gLDJ3ICaYSlWQIIdjCBJUOuvdBN
osPKDNLmuz46X0JlRMEoN2k1-JsMxq3TYZlG9u-BELN4$> .

Thank you,
Pavan (Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)

PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

 

Juniper Business Use Only