IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 15 May 2022 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF203C26E8AD for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2022 13:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STPoU_c1uopG for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2022 13:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84D54C237D15 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2022 13:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 24FKXmLx020534 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2022 21:33:48 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDAC4604B for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2022 21:33:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0254603D for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2022 21:33:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2022 21:33:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (229.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.229] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 24FKXljG020527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2022 21:33:48 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas@ietf.org
References: <304610859.1999429.1652646179492.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <304610859.1999429.1652646179492@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <304610859.1999429.1652646179492@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 21:33:48 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <005901d8689b$155ebee0$401c3ca0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005A_01D868A3.77248670"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQGwAG0uW2RaS8socqsNOrXNrg07FAG1OLRTrWOLb+A=
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.229
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-26896.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--35.301-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--35.301-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-26896.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--35.300600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: dH5hHB8uvKYQo9nihO6svlXqZnTRddaaEQhiCpPoPCJFSULGbXbuREly MZ48GKwU5+x52qfezoGip5w7Zewk3h8U4+qfPzLsbagO61DordPXM7RcFSw5Z6oE3sUN5PqJ+s0 +QZYAcN8IKj6WwO7KdZxW1jD8YQF6+36T7020AwRUvuFi0BemlrpcwSSUlj9tePGAeSn124Kz8d 6zvo5NkAB/VXYA74kPNH3B1Tro2RJn5g2D5tSPFs3mK0TK5CHEtAdoU09on6jxYbEdTQzoxY4V8 tCoXo/S2aGwk4OLNSzk++hGM2nSe493WUsgC0XiUf5Rc7fZG8slixpv00FPyiesB55guI/gARpr Im1hk218YqfgMaIV5SchfAaDKwjQ7/+9swuISRXT7QbuKj/gda1DnvO5cSZcx7fBXoDaFyFSAph tkUXoaE6/jSCpJm/Pt/uBLiP+bI84KPKQxy+E/gvBPGQoLW6lDWo1/vBF88XM0QPdYuYm93chjF F7GmAAfpAHEtIudzCg3163xoIAU/tN2vjEPERNhjOnJudfcN1h5+y4K2Uv50DhU8Vgq6FvAjqAx uWkdTGjT0w/TJJw6C2818Jova4CbVsEFJqff8nvp8GuZhjBudh2Ct38hdsBadiTrUwxL27ii75U ldPq9iUnLzk1+IxztB9hTyYdtJGb7IaV8KOKDf/OZ0sXECMqYD/6842MUCMU5uZWwHqhooHfzWJ nn0eod+Xu1v+6rdTjkQGepEId1aAbcN3kw3YW/XVOP8FVfqKAMuqetGVettLvsKjhs0lda9+JVK onO7dXhqN9H2OPZ2F5X5yuwToh8DFFIBzQ4Q0i4mJ41W/O+n7cGd19dSFd
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/BpEqixyuZTpL0BuVacmlkAAehhQ>
Subject: [Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 20:33:57 -0000

Forwarding to the list for the record

 

From: Boris Hassanov <bhassanov@yahoo.com> 
Sent: 15 May 2022 21:23
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>; 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>; Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net>
Cc: 'Boris Khasanov' <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>; EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

 

Hi all,                                                                                                                                                                                     

 "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"                                                                  SY,                                                                                                                                                   Boris                                                                                                                                             

On Friday, May 13, 2022, 03:25:28 PM GMT+3, Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net <mailto:ggrammel@juniper.net> > wrote: 

 

 

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

 

Best

 

Gert

 

From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> >
Date: Friday, 13. May 2022 at 13:39
To: Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net <mailto:ggrammel@juniper.net> >, 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net> >, 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu> >, 'Boris Hassanov' <bhassanov@yahoo.com <mailto:bhassanov@yahoo.com> >
Cc: 'Boris Khasanov' <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru <mailto:bhassanov@yandex-team.ru> >, EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com <mailto:EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com>  <vishnupavan@gmail.com <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com> >
Subject: FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

 

Hi Gert, Lou, Loa, Boris,

 

Still looking for IPR responses from you for this draft.

 

Thanks,

Adrian

 

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com> > 
Sent: 06 May 2022 18:02
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> >; Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net <mailto:ggrammel@juniper.net> >; Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu <mailto:loa@pi.nu> >; Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> >; Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net <mailto:lberger@labn.net> >; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> >; Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk <mailto:daniel@olddog.co.uk> >; bhassanov@yandex-team.ru <mailto:bhassanov@yandex-team.ru> ; Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com <mailto:kiranm@futurewei.com> >; Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> >; mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> 
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org> >; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org> >
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

 

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.

NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FTluGxGz_IP0gLDJ3ICaYSlWQIIdjCBJUOuvdBNosPKDNLmuz46X0JlRMEoN2k1-JsMxq3TYZlG9u-BELN4$> .

Thank you,
Pavan (Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)

PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

 

Juniper Business Use Only

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email