IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] John Scudder's Yes on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)

Jeong-dong Ryoo <ryoo@etri.re.kr> Tue, 19 April 2022 10:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84D03A1244 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dooray.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0daHXbO3zTLS for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mscreen.etri.re.kr (mscreen.etri.re.kr [129.254.9.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD7F03A1213 for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 03:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO send001-relay.gov-dooray.com) (211.180.235.152) by 129.254.9.16 with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2022 19:30:18 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 211.180.235.152
X-Original-MAILFROM: ryoo@etri.re.kr
X-Original-RCPTTO: teas@ietf.org
Received: from [10.162.225.109] (HELO send002.gov-dooray.com) ([10.162.225.109]) by send001-relay.gov-dooray.com with SMTP id 3ee7f7a4625e8f3a; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:30:18 +0900
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=C/n3EyEp8mjzwsKP+Wj0pXHNWHc0RYdHx0nMs3SMZjhGizZdl8bFT1wTGfmVI422pxmwAlSXFL l1Uyk9rh81z3LaiWzMYZfMn5JB1zc5GAyDeOoD1anVqCVsvjBSoucpFclk5Mp2E4mwlrVTmTSc5X 0lKhck0w0GpuI05zPVHPlLHLlnuevv0GndUrARRfkqJaa1r2Co63Eevnw8u7raQD0KNsieIcYq/i p1177rAB8iLSaRlI3kFMGlcpo8kh0bUtF5TmR3ARcLp4MqygIqlBzyUsoZxt73E3X7PXDziBW50t LbleOcQMPYQPIJhYwORlmPrs64dgZHicTj/StDnw==; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=selector; d=dooray.com; v=1; bh=6MtTe6DblcwhF6a92h1UP8W4w/x0j5hs/YTBlBEToS0=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID;
Dooray-Meta-Signature: eWnp8BHKJiWA7pJOfwlqHMkh/CRg+DIqjDj+YqEZ18lK58yWQMaiD qZ7xuzL6eJz6s915o7W1VucUCd+W2Cmmzb1Yz6hTpO6WkJGj6mVBaiigzlMafiLUfPLuVCEGghQD 6h4WyFM4T6X/sHqnf2tKykA6SRHVU9TsMbFTbRePlWgOfqN6u5M3J1tLyKOsroCj+51vUG3QH7Ti I5EKSzy8xdp8SHmHcJqDosRx4T/85ug+kjelb3zJouvP7C4v1j5z+3M2u7qgRe8+G5UPfCl1v7M8 tD/mX8oZc3SDFIaylfOI+31yegaRQQbkWIWeMyA6RVgJr68i5gAPanEhgNYVgWzZhkPIz0jYs6ZW c5QsKw=
Received: from [129.254.197.129] (HELO 129.254.197.129) ([129.254.197.129]) by send002.gov-dooray.com with SMTP id e1de9147625e8f39; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:30:17 +0900
From: Jeong-dong Ryoo <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp@ietf.org, teas-chairs@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, vbeeram@juniper.net
Message-ID: <oqcu4gnqr4x6.oqcu4gnr7maq.g1@dooray.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Dsn-Request: true
X-Dooray-Agent: mail-api
X-Dooray-Mail-Id: 3255284714154125226
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: Normal
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Dooray-Attached: c3+LUOpPU/IB7Wl+oemm0lw5HiI/bJHHYClX72L8E3o=
Sender: ryoo@etri.re.kr
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:30:17 +0900
References: <164925971272.1399.3525575422410005733@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <164925971272.1399.3525575422410005733@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/ET6120gu4QngdakP9tWKLareJfM>
Subject: Re: [Teas] John Scudder's Yes on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:30:28 -0000

Hi, John.


Thank you for catching that!

Yes, it is a typo. It will be corrected in the revision.


Best regards,

Jeong-dong



-----Original Message-----
From:  "John Scudder via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org>
To:     "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>; 
Cc:      <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp@ietf.org>;   <teas-chairs@ietf.org>;   <teas@ietf.org>;   <vbeeram@juniper.net>;   <vbeeram@juniper.net>; 
Sent:  2022-04-07 (목) 00:42:01 (UTC+09:00)
Subject: John Scudder's Yes on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I just noticed that RFC 4873 has:

      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |I|R|   Reserved    | Seg.Flags |           Reserved            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

But this draft has:

      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |I|R|   Reserved    | Seq.Flags |   Reserved    | Preempt Prio  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"Seg" with a G got changed into "Seq" with a Q. I assume that was a typo and should be corrected.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email