[Teas] John Scudder's Yes on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)
John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 06 April 2022 15:41 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CBC3A0CA8; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 08:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp@ietf.org, teas-chairs@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, vbeeram@juniper.net, vbeeram@juniper.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <164925971272.1399.3525575422410005733@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 08:41:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/j4DceocWQbvuWkRLnTte9EIV1wE>
Subject: [Teas] John Scudder's Yes on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 15:41:53 -0000
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I just noticed that RFC 4873 has: +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |I|R| Reserved | Seg.Flags | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ But this draft has: +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |I|R| Reserved | Seq.Flags | Reserved | Preempt Prio | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ "Seg" with a G got changed into "Seq" with a Q. I assume that was a typo and should be corrected.
- [Teas] John Scudder's Yes on draft-ietf-teas-gmpl… John Scudder via Datatracker
- Re: [Teas] John Scudder's Yes on draft-ietf-teas-… Jeong-dong Ryoo