[Teas] 答复: Fwd: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-05

"Aijun Wang" <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Tue, 25 June 2019 07:44 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8886412009E for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6-4ElGDS-1O for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m21397.mail.qiye.163.com (m21397.mail.qiye.163.com [223.252.213.97]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDA712004A for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WangajPC (unknown [219.142.69.77]) by m21397.mail.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 431AB14538C; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:43:54 +0800 (CST)
From: "Aijun Wang" <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: "'Qin Wu'" <bill.wu@huawei.com>, <lberger@labn.bet>
Cc: <teas@ietf.org>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA49AD1BB@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA49AD1BB@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:43:51 +0800
Message-ID: <019201d52b29$bcd99fd0$368cdf70$@org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0193_01D52B6C.CAFCDFD0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdUrHDfp7RwKKJqPQq6W3e1FF0YkFAACJqtw
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgYFAkeWUFZVklVS0hOS0tKSUxMQklITkNZV1koWU FKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQkOFx4IWUFZNTQpNjo3JCkuNz5ZBg++
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6MiI6Myo*NDlCQysPQk4DES9P ODAwCxJVSlVKTk1KT09DTUhCTUNMVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxMWVdZCAFZQUlIT0NKNwY+
X-HM-Tid: 0a6b8d9758117f6bkuuk431ab14538c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Hzzy2TYMLYMwj6fUuqv-RmZDsJs>
Subject: [Teas] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiAgRndkOiBXRyBMYXN0IENhbGw6IGRyYWZ0?= =?utf-8?q?-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-05?=
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:44:06 -0000

Hi, Qin:

 

Thanks for your review.

Please see the responses below inline for your comments.

 

Best Regards.

 

Aijun Wang

Network R&D and Operation Support Department

China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China.

 

发件人: Qin Wu [mailto:bill.wu@huawei.com] 
发送时间: 2019年6月25日 14:40
收件人: lberger@labn.bet
抄送: teas@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Teas] Fwd: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-05

 

I have read this draft and have a few comments:

1.       Section 1 paragraph2 

“   MPLS-TE technology is one solution for finely planned network but it

   will put heavy burden on the routers when we use it to meet the

   dynamic QoS assurance requirements within real time traffic network.”

Do we have real time traffic network, how about s/ QoS assurance requirements within real time traffic network/ QoS assurance requirements for real time traffic

【Aijun Wang】: Yes, we have.  The scenarios described in this document are all raised on our Native IP network. Customer wants the operator to provide some solutions to these requirements. The traffic is changing dynamically in real time, but it has some regular pattern within a day, a week or a month.  The solution to these requirements is described in  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip/ (Solution Draft), which depends mainly on the global view and optimal path calculation capabilities of SDN/PCE components.

 

2.       Section 1, paragraph 4

“DetNet[RFC8578] describes use cases for diverse industries that have

   in common a need for "deterministic flows",”

s/ that have in common a need/that have a common need

【Aijun Wang】: OK, will update in next version.

 

3.       Section 2.1

“

The communication between the private and public cloud will span the WAN

network.  The bandwidth requirements between them are variable and

the background traffic between these two sites changes from time to

time. “

To make these two sentence coherent and consist with the figure in this section, suggested change
The communication between the private and public cloud sites will span the WAN

network.  The bandwidth requirements between them are variable and

the background traffic between these two sites changes from time to

time.

【Aijun Wang】: OK, will update in next version.

 

4.  Section 2.3

Can you clarify what traffic engineering technology is used in this case? If there is no traffic engineering technology used,

Suggest to change the title into traffic load balance support

【Aijun Wang】: It is one special situation within TE domain and is different from the traditional load balance scenario. As described in the text, the main challenge here is that the asymmetric flow characteristic of the links. One can only eliminate such phenomena via the movement of some traffic from the default path to the calculated optimal path.

 

-Qin

From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Date: June 14, 2019 at 00:51:17 GMT+8
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-05

All,

This starts a two-week working group last call for
draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-05

The working group last call ends on June 27.
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.

Thank you,
Lou (TEAS Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas