IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] Comparison Analysis (TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting (before IETF-95))

Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com> Sun, 24 January 2016 04:26 UTC

Return-Path: <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D26A1B3C9B; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:26:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Uoxnxx5peVq; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:26:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2623D1B3C9C; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:26:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CHI70805; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 04:26:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.218.25.35) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 04:26:13 +0000
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.143]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.108]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:26:10 -0800
From: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
To: "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Comparison Analysis (TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting (before IETF-95))
Thread-Index: AQHRVl9Zalrl55QV70C84ap8dnZXOw==
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 04:26:10 +0000
Message-ID: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D44E4D14CE@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTtWFWX08ae=1yT29Sx8K040Cv9vAk5+pfA0Rhujf+LNHA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTtWFWX08ae=1yT29Sx8K040Cv9vAk5+pfA0Rhujf+LNHA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.146.247]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D44E4D14CESJCEML701CHMchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.56A45266.009C, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.143, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 0cf59113e82861c6af7fc804c19671ef
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/K4H4X9O0Ia4Ml36WxglO933FwJY>
Subject: [Teas] Comparison Analysis (TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting (before IETF-95))
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 04:26:21 -0000

Hi Chairs,

    Thanks for organizing the interim meeting.

    Lou asked for technical trade-off discussion of the current options in the I-D, these are:

        (1) Relay-Message Method

        (2) Proxy-Ingress Method

I conducted analysis and documented my results, these can be seen at:
http://www.slideshare.net/HuaimoChen/analysis-2methods
The findings include an example of both techniques. Looking forward to the interim call.

Best Regards,
Huaimo


From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 9:33 PM
To: teas@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Teas] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting (before IETF-95)

Folks, Hi!

Happy New Year!!

We’d like the TEAS WG to hold a virtual interim meeting before IETF-95 to cover the following topic -

"RSVP Ingress Protection / Egress Protection” -- target meeting the week
of 25 January 2015 (with a second meeting possible if needed):
The main purpose of the meeting is to help select one of the two alternatives contained in <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection>. A secondary purpose is to facilitate further discussion on <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection>, and gauge WG consensus on both drafts.

The following doodle poll will aid in selecting the exact date/time for this meeting: http://doodle.com/poll/7g4st77huxv66z2d

Regards,
Pavan and Lou.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email