IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting (before IETF-95)

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Wed, 06 January 2016 02:33 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262661A8971; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:33:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ki5Qm6HYCfLo; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:32:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E266B1A89B0; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id k1so149674945vkb.2; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:32:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sFN9AZX+R+6r9cxsQppvynt2L7H2AFGMnwUgzdB9oZM=; b=DLZS9OqRmqv1MrQjNHKriRzqiNl5/lzaG4ktSu85jMaoZi7hoVw+erN/tuqMyxegvD JjcfM3QHggvLvIEgFCakOCgu0clWC5IPFPuuomPfMOePme49E4Bvr9777y8Z3aeRjBV/ u2afHVMBiWszvCwCllnaaFF3X0dSCpweNhmlWZJ3lunkWS0ztzuYuiZa+QOZGYxYaTaV 1JGhXvVlBQiCt1GXCZLr6tBa2Qw9c728MQOXHurCKJjL/COZFxbechwkovs7bDsVr7Cw PJiVMHxYKK4+UuSy/7tjeKxI7ecElulDYCvlxS5evX6q3isZ61M7BCmKyQ/MyPrjozt1 piqg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.155.23 with SMTP id d23mr59640486vke.146.1452047575794; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:32:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.193.84 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:32:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 21:32:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTtWFWX08ae=1yT29Sx8K040Cv9vAk5+pfA0Rhujf+LNHA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, teas-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11426686f3ccb40528a12b17"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/uGo1WZadaOHkDl1mXu8IuSmMXxg>
Subject: [Teas] TEAS WG Virtual Interim Meeting (before IETF-95)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 02:33:00 -0000

Folks, Hi!

Happy New Year!!

We’d like the TEAS WG to hold a virtual interim meeting before IETF-95 to
cover the following topic -

"RSVP Ingress Protection / Egress Protection” -- target meeting the week
of 25 January 2015 (with a second meeting possible if needed):
The main purpose of the meeting is to help select one of the two
alternatives contained in <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection>. A
secondary purpose is to facilitate further discussion on
<draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection>, and gauge WG consensus on both
drafts.

The following doodle poll will aid in selecting the exact date/time for
this meeting: http://doodle.com/poll/7g4st77huxv66z2d

Regards,
Pavan and Lou.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email