IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] A clarification request for draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp

Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> Mon, 23 February 2015 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7913F1A03C7 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 02:09:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DN3bGY5xC62n for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 02:09:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5411A0019 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 02:09:56 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79626d000003cf6-48-54eafc72d0a4
Received: from ESESSHC024.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 04.8C.15606.27CFAE45; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:09:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.39]) by ESESSHC024.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.90]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:09:53 +0100
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
To: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] A clarification request for draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp
Thread-Index: AQHQSHS7VChW+A9vF02TeoXKRQnF+5z5khDegAATLICAA36CYA==
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:09:53 +0000
Message-ID: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4812884B8D@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
References: <54E73708.9080205@pi.nu> <D10CBD7B.504F7%rgandhi@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D10CBD7B.504F7%rgandhi@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7Rn1chBh1PZSw6mt+yWPybO4fZ YmpTB5tF648dLA4sHlN+b2T1WLLkJ5PHh03NbB6zprexBbBEcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGV8XjyL teAhT0XL34/sDYytXF2MnBwSAiYSff0fmSFsMYkL99azdTFycQgJHGGUeHqklx3CWcwo8Wb9 MaAqDg42ASuJJ4d8QOIiAn2MEl+232QE6RYWSJY4sXk6E4gtIpAisWfaTDYI20ni1Pc1YBtY BFQlfnX0s4DYvAK+Etd+vgKrERJwl9jy4iFYL6eAvsSjy51gcUYBWYkJuxeBzWcWEJe49WQ+ E8SlAhJL9pyHulpU4uXjf6wgt0kIKEos75eDKNeTuDF1ChuErS2xbOFrZoi1ghInZz5hmcAo OgvJ1FlIWmYhaZmFpGUBI8sqRtHi1OKk3HQjI73Uoszk4uL8PL281JJNjMB4Orjlt8EOxpfP HQ8xCnAwKvHwbpj+KkSINbGsuDL3EKM0B4uSOK+d8aEQIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xM HJxSDYw+y80YEp7vmO5jU3+g4Sj/uxi51z82i990nbfk+/YLInmZn6ID4uUj3FR2z1z8JkP5 33r/Gec58tfczbh74k2KmPEv11vpX6f5L3dv+N3Z9OKvK+dXTee+1zuWzXu8JyMtwutUt4Tx JouVt8NS44yPFWq5CTu9eygyedW107esnsdv+b35yIsLSizFGYmGWsxFxYkADP7LqogCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Odf6Qqq5l4B93DuTs1sgU9yaH1o>
Subject: Re: [Teas] A clarification request for draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:09:58 -0000

I tend to agree. I think option (a) is reasonable. 

BR
Daniele


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rakesh Gandhi
> (rgandhi)
> Sent: venerdì 20 febbraio 2015 16:40
> To: Loa Andersson; Lou Berger; teas@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Teas] A clarification request for draft-ietf-teas-mpls-tp-rsvpte-
> ext-associated-lsp
> 
> Hi Loa,
> 
> This is for the associated bidirectional LSPs when using single sided
> provisioning.
> Specially, when the initiating node is inserting the ASSOCIATION Object with
> Association Type "Single Sided Associated Bidirectional LSP" to trigger
> creation of reverse LSP on the egress node.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rakesh
> 
> 
> On 2015-02-20 8:30 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> >Lou,
> >
> >There are lots of "forward LSPs" out there, what is the criteria more
> >in detail where the REVERSE_LSP Object will be required if we choose
> >option 1?
> >
> >/Loa
> >
> >On 2015-02-18 10:09, Lou Berger wrote:
> >> Some options:
> >> a) Always require a  REVERSE_LSP Object in the forward LSP
> >
> >--
> >
> >
> >Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> >Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> >Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Teas mailing list
> >Teas@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email