Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-peru-teas-actn-poi-applicability

Dhruv Dhody <> Wed, 26 August 2020 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4583A14C2; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VKnaIoSWIuZI; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E17D23A14BF; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id w3so1757740ilh.5; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RXo8HsmTzqlrzsNls+4i43OFypLq7rJQuSqxn4sv3gU=; b=Ewn7duWdhcBMqmclldU/lu0Y+v+5HtVcY/b9yaXJ8YMBUBpHu++UhlU0f7iphVY5gs tAfAl8wtY1ou5jvG3PxLEordG05RrF+vI+A589GgUqA8EczlEBMjytFF8kk5Vwgrl1kg 3/qzOws/Fl5bZ0Ua3t06nfH4r+c428LgATqugtY/mwhX/zpmtc8+65iX330AB16ccKfQ vqTLDpMUF36ZmuguoYORrEb1tDMu1MlbxdHFOVENmtZtR0G7Y8PZLukLut3ard07EKXt cIcjQr8BPlWSipq3tKsfb43qgrIyVUmv4qVCacEF3NE4Zq4dIdziVbnBvOuhNgzyo95v w6kQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RXo8HsmTzqlrzsNls+4i43OFypLq7rJQuSqxn4sv3gU=; b=ZaPdeeI75WoXTpCAqBUZBDFr0EdfClG9Pi6d9Zy/9yv07+26OPdqm7XWY/EWMsBLqr ie/WhXmJ6SIwZZp7BB19lPOSZ7yu6SMXi92ESzAnenah4ZyfOB/0j485r7lzxIJBRTLo zU5zDHbixRLQeH1in/dEMOtaXCpoou7Eb4ZU8cCHYg7YA/15MobhsuI5AG84UjnYfzGC jOF9lcVMh6VS7lVp4TF5pfUOOs4FNCWVK+YQJb7jrZbckVF/Vp+RZNJtvgvVLRNLvURa XX0rt+1YtlCAehvd529iSGL7KzrnQlj8ZGu9KfMR7jP+Qp5gP0DUPSDb+qFzxJm0u0Hq hn0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jAAE5fqf65teDBnDHP8383FtZb+/WjGeN1D1mbsajrpQqIQKf fZZ6PF4igzGo5AWFaSoAg23vu4QqrLkP7zbNKbw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6DjXtSr7vnXBVlVXyOdTCmX1zscaZi2R7i/tae+SB3PyUIDUYpKLSWLD3LiOjS6Hyg0RNgnJkz6rQhln0YEQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:de43:: with SMTP id e3mr12570413ilr.124.1598451185898; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Dhruv Dhody <>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:42:29 +0530
Message-ID: <>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <>
Cc: TEAS WG <>, TEAS WG Chairs <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-peru-teas-actn-poi-applicability
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:13:08 -0000

Hi Authors, WG,

Yes/support for WG adoption!

I see value in these applicability documents. The
draft-li-teas-hierarchy-ip-controllers does a similar job but for just
IP controllers.

Will the authors consider adding a section on PCE/PCEP? There is a
rich history of using PCE/PCEP for inter-layer path computation and
RFC 8637 briefly covers it. If needed I can help contribute text.

I agree with the editor's note in section 5 and work is needed to get
better integration. I also wonder what needs to be kept in the scope
of this I-D (as a lot of text is useful but independent of POI). I am
wondering if it should be moved to TE service mapping draft as I also
see a lot of text repeated from there.

Figure 2 needs to reconcile with draft-ietf-teas-actn-yang that does
not differentiate between the ACTN and non-ACTN interfaces and list
them together. Would be good to figure out if this difference helps
with the description or hinders it.

I got lost in section 5.5 but let's leave that for future discussion.


On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:08 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram
<> wrote:
> All,
> This is start of a two week poll on making
> draft-peru-teas-actn-poi-applicability-05 a TEAS working group document.
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
> like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> The poll ends Aug 27th.
> Thanks,
> Pavan and Lou
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list