Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics

Daniele Ceccarelli <> Fri, 31 May 2019 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538A4120122; Fri, 31 May 2019 15:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sYF-Gg1yk7Pp; Fri, 31 May 2019 15:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe0a::60e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C6012011C; Fri, 31 May 2019 15:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=XtJ0Xy2aQ5ZDLwNcxEawkZwvoVPWSZSwrzDBTCpDYlQ=; b=nTf2X4gRkpv5fbFw0iW1lYcJdoS7O6zlS0pmBn2lX+dzNyz/oxd/tnxPRypq7ZT1ektqDFMlGl05cDBvLYOdLOfkoUyHPZ8obclkxtKOkAJX8AS6f0O9jySz1u4rMph0jGc6S4NzBlnyVNVg1gP1qD+sLPONdJtJlQyvt1u1a5E=
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1943.13; Fri, 31 May 2019 22:00:00 +0000
Received: from ([fe80::4822:6daf:1994:3b30]) by ([fe80::4822:6daf:1994:3b30%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1943.018; Fri, 31 May 2019 22:00:00 +0000
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <>
To: Dhruv Dhody <>, "King, Daniel" <>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <>, "" <>, Leeyoung <>, Ricard Vilalta <>
CC: TEAS WG <>, TEAS WG Chairs <>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics
Thread-Index: AQHVF9F0EWW7ky7lGUeM3os45GkngaaFfmEAgABKXX4=
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 21:59:59 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>, <LO2P265MB0909E5D60CBF91466CD9667AD6190@LO2P265MB0909.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <LO2P265MB0909E5D60CBF91466CD9667AD6190@LO2P265MB0909.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: it-IT
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is );
x-originating-ip: []
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c3ff214d-5500-4f20-3147-08d6e61353a2
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM0PR07MB5332;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM0PR07MB5332:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-ld-processed: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f,ExtAddr
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:5236;
x-forefront-prvs: 00540983E2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(8676002)(31686004)(14454004)(6512007)(66946007)(81166006)(4326008)(81156014)(53936002)(99286004)(8936002)(66476007)(486006)(66556008)(86362001)(5070765005)(91956017)(66446008)(73956011)(508600001)(31696002)(2501003)(26005)(606006)(186003)(64756008)(236005)(6436002)(6306002)(5660300002)(54896002)(76116006)(229853002)(316002)(966005)(3846002)(446003)(2616005)(6116002)(476003)(25786009)(66066001)(256004)(54906003)(110136005)(2906002)(6246003)(36756003)(71200400001)(68736007)(71190400001)(102836004)(44832011)(7736002)(6486002)(6506007)(76176011)(11346002)(53546011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM0PR07MB5332;; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None ( does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: +4PYeB4eRSyiQY7bTb0/wCLb5y4xOFei8PMNPdy6b0r0TR/o3QideKx8reC/QZy7w/Wgx9OR9Qv/+1EnvXzakZOKJ9Fr5R2XoyBMi71cF9bY4Out2mYCVg9QkKghsm1fhXJzeYFh+8HBC7vdIhJzBYWv8N1kE2yocbuiNiVI5IOJ/aTFHRWq5eiJrTJfQIrTdlycYiYdWOxZLfGkhwyQgYWW7PsdlIrYSJB94vV4awrT68Mvb0qgXTyCJejUGG6TznLhc39VlnOu9diAl7lT4LR1SdNmWRSWueBsiZ55MxgV1JRnBmDovFm/stxC6i1GUDZY1tlvO6imQt/9m6DDIuVhlZjkWhBqrqbuhFsf2uBimWYByladJOvvr9wpQkLlIAsCFIVoAnVHTK7Piu48SyCsQZewRYRmK+1J7TdLUVE=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a439258f9a934a558ee36b292a7a5493ericssoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c3ff214d-5500-4f20-3147-08d6e61353a2
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 May 2019 21:59:59.9980 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR07MB5332
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 22:00:07 -0000

Hi Pavan, all,

  No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft


Inviato da Workspace ONE Boxer

Il 31 Mag 2019 19:34, "King, Daniel" <> ha scritto:
Hi Chairs, all.

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

BR, Dan.

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <>
Sent: 31 May 2019 17:54
To: Leeyoung <>om>; Dhruv Dhody <>om>;;; King, Daniel <>uk>; Daniele Ceccarelli <>
Cc: TEAS WG <>rg>; TEAS WG Chairs <>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou