IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 06 July 2023 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC4FC151089; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.994
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.994 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PANHqf9akpsI; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C8DC151066; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 366K7rE1010348; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 21:07:54 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2D84605C; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 21:07:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9824605B; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 21:07:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 21:07:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ioxnode1.iomartmail.com (ioxnode1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 366K7r45018216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Jul 2023 21:07:53 +0100
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 21:07:53 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>, Behcet Sarikaya via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1704299960.180482.1688674073535@www.getmymail.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <168866344991.33805.8636839660669849480@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <168866344991.33805.8636839660669849480@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev44
X-Originating-IP: 185.69.145.54
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=date :from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=glX3cs1jdBvhL7/8vm8CbT0R5T5isyqkmaXM/jvM6ws=; b=UTI wXMSvMR/fKExoRBXBcoy7kTrsD0cU48URcP8a8udk4zCROg3m/0oixwT7aNYGIzr fDuPdvX8hVZDd2VojgqXneGN80v+9aez4vmPmBXYo0yC3sH3wNuWaglDfz/m22MQ L47zC13OU8lms/ZpCyZBu33j7q6+Ijt1OlSrVbLp3MW9OliM1C224Tfjk4CPWKmm vBuxHJ+oUhRhuYmd1HyUdz1NeG4/X3z70FPBoC5OFInqtHLiwnucI2QvXDVDQhm0 6flWfsTmIJDzUCT0Jf0Q9DCJ4a/yAEca4O9gXeqgOWeCdpPFToFEjO9Y6BuTGneW UZqLCtYIyvustEAk7MA==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27736.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.450-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--12.450-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27736.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--12.450300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: fxpBUgWUqcotjw5zGtj91Gg4D2QV/2zLrogFtKd/P7ceummt8VRy++j0 B6obqgb2Ng312Sb9Xr2k/vy0BdhmpR2VQwNxPgu7uLt50vtxBA5d5/m3qrxFzP/PlfQrPF26oT+ 7K9IgTZf/eYnp242RQ4HQRlmHVYnGtU4lqmVgqI8v09a+vBP41jK1/qdbjc7QL31P64kiV5FaGO YWNVxksnC3EfW33mGfksQJNnRGijWZWxtBzxGhQZIkscdvYoAtfkuZtv/FS5o3i77Vts9niZjEV SrXIIiRd40MH3HfU/Ne7PkhSbTKtoahAPdqafj1xDiakrJ+Spn4qCLIu0mtIONj3z/fQI1fktSQ vkIuBAqXcV/PU+Qptxxj8sAmQ05FT/Djs1VF+lTzwi6hmzCfvwGo1vhC/pWjP4H+2nyK0FN1D9+ mbtMf36xIkzy9f+IdV+CxF/dBx1xw9FeguoaaAEjBweol1dLFkydnhyKTV3heRR4DvaxwRfgTFA 9EWwWs92grUwQgYZfGhnE0dv/2eVxxDx5qbkR9OX/V8P8ail1yZ8zcONpAsQSTC8t6yZ3k
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/RRXNYo16rHZqLrht10EWl8HeBzs>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 20:08:10 -0000

Thanks Behcet.
 
The "n.d." is an artefact of xml2rfc. I'll leave that for the RFC Editor to worry about.
 
We could add an abreviations section if anyone feels strongly (I don't, and I'm not looking for extra work :-)
 
Cheers,
Adrian
On 06/07/2023 18:10 BST Behcet Sarikaya via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
 
 
Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
Review result: Ready with Nits
 
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
 
For more information, please see the FAQ at
 
 
Document: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-??
Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
Review Date: 2023-07-06
IETF LC End Date: 2023-07-11
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
 
Summary:This document is a bis document intended to obsolete RFC3272 that
describes the principles of traffic engineering in the Internet. Since RFC3272
published in 2003 is an informational RFC, this document's status is also set
as informational RFC although it could have been a BCP. The document gives a
nice account of all changes that happened on traffic engineering since the past
20 years. I specifically looked for IPv6, YANG to replace SNMP, SDN,
Virtualization and also Quic and MPTCP in the context of ATSSS, they were all
very well covered. The document is very well written. What I couldn't find are
the coverage of cloud issues, edge computing, data center interconnect which
are just mentioned and identifier locator separation work not even mentioned.
 
Major issues:N/A
 
Minor issues:N/A
 
Nits/editorial comments:
The last two references FT01 and GRPC have n.d. meaning no date?
The document has a nice terminology section 1.4 and most acronyms have been
spelled out but there is no acronyms section

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email