[Teas] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24

Brian Haberman via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 18 July 2023 20:34 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Haberman via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <168971248102.54775.5223242476524587538@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 13:34:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/TdMJgz03Irp00D1uziAAJV_X9Rc>
Subject: [Teas] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24

Reviewer: Brian Haberman
Review result: Ready

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document
editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat
comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other
Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT
Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

I reviewed this draft as a diff between it and RFC 3272. I found it
well-written and ready for publication. I see no issues with the draft from an
INT Area perspective.

[Teas] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-… Brian Haberman via Datatracker
Re: [Teas] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-t… Adrian Farrel