IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 18 July 2023 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D938BC151078; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 13:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSvt1jSQ558n; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 13:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A811CC14CF09; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 13:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 36IKsTvb012542; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:54:29 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971344604A; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:54:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A46446043; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:54:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:54:29 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-69-109-75.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 36IKsSIs023190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:54:29 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Brian Haberman' <brian@innovationslab.net>, int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org
References: <168971248102.54775.5223242476524587538@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <168971248102.54775.5223242476524587538@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:54:28 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <041b01d9b9ba$0bb1fd50$2315f7f0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQG1gO8RokbdEDnUlJOPUPRVnoeyKLAIchZw
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 82.69.109.75
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=UHiFc6+fSf2j1Ch8XBHM3ILbYa7R7f1Ni8vE5nNQ4do=; b=icp zLGsuXD+sowdNhoNn/puCgUzErfErAknjAr//yTfvmrAdJVKzCpd9s5PJXhi0qFx QvyCDG92QJ+30u7olF1GoSw3s6v+FbCmh9JvaopaKIwYAt78xF3gwXiCnjj3h2Sl uqKoeyc6cA/nGvmGIteLHxswv1XrxikSC233FyVE7wMF1G5JI4PsSKBMiVROlWVY 3/sDphUm+XplpYrz9ZgbKsxiqQA8CBmn9289NMdUTC+Yr4DeD28/bJXrYCXf0BG1 L3S26TRkvAAv6CWLTIEBfOURepUvX0w7PL/BKjSGf0szC0TzMzDLwUllbwyy9TUv dyGdlC4Q+j3bBXtqCvw==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27760.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--6.023-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--6.023-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27760.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--6.023300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: oTBA/+sdKabxIbpQ8BhdbI61Z+HJnvsOxddRrnptOecutoY2UtFqGAeM JMgXjcj9Awr1d1MD+niCIK86yt222ubNhPxw6RtZWBc1kxSpeD/UoMiU4Mi75eJ0Q2/kwXnaxQB QHPALSx6VjXj+YYNd0quylFjicmBgKaVhNcZodfmdVNZaI2n6/1/d6ediod7YwLkNMQzGl5CK/P cAuVLj1izrjfVzUtV18iuyXv00RhcID4rkuCl2gp4CIKY/Hg3AnCGS1WQEGtAXqNNeAKWixgzKt 8/2P4LVIAcCikR3vq/wDfV3pz4AvsC9ZUfiNMFbdBX01pPL8iVeE0WXFCr60awla0tekYeH
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/_-DF5XQtal_B1BU3ixOrzHQ7fDY>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:54:38 -0000

Thanks for taking the time Brian.

Cheers,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Haberman via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: 18 July 2023 21:35
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org; teas@ietf.org
Subject: Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24

Reviewer: Brian Haberman
Review result: Ready

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document
editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat
comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other
Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT
Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

I reviewed this draft as a diff between it and RFC 3272. I found it
well-written and ready for publication. I see no issues with the draft from an
INT Area perspective.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email