IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-21

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Thu, 09 November 2023 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B1DC18E1AD; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 06:25:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.845
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMaDdPKpga7s; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 06:25:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096C5C187716; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 06:25:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-52bd9ddb741so1473567a12.0; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 06:25:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699539911; x=1700144711; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=q9J6B4yb4+F3M5tAylT1bpfpK4mXk3ZS1ciJlluFLJo=; b=NQt4Fry6GFMwLxR1UA6Op0uLbH7LTNU7mQWG5ATp6PBFtSXsMdub5TCVnPXTl9UE51 sLE+H7ANKN6DDgl0cJviwkwmsusYWkWXEVAX8+8bs9JwMP6cupnsM/IesOE4+kgtePnX eEHWi8EMzxuqvPgefGHayFHDeah+AclGy5PVapGQAhvf/MBlWYq7EIgThScKxJ2E6QpA bnDbJyqiUd/EIMdhfI5dPmdMx/ji/FsDRmSSSS58zHf0pfU/oUWGKOay5eE5sCdjkD8m sQG5dvCiHELix3jANsMqDhNIuDy04GabQ8lCAUuRvm2DiEyHRjOLvnRqiTYqvgDNoRub +Ycg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699539911; x=1700144711; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=q9J6B4yb4+F3M5tAylT1bpfpK4mXk3ZS1ciJlluFLJo=; b=YSQgi7L204+lavD1PCIV/8B7ZojTHUGx8Q5gBQLTWzUr+CL1wa81iLJRWc+6/uFqaX t9vaEvo5CB0XfvPwpLOP4I0mTrX3OIy4mqyYCGKjvfzGCXH9lAexvI1sgS4fawCZn0ij ukTzmWoRooh5EC9oojx/d9JadeIjmqyPXokoRtnNZwrUpw8sYGVkt2D4qkId1Z/0+GSw SpbvP1oYyyV7rexG9OX4MAyxGzl9VWH+bA/yqA9PGWn3v1R13Iz8VguTFqZKa5x8hfIB xP0PpJ4JcO9M6RsuaZR4+h/tI5GlMJg52dtHQJHhZZmAnQrw4IwcUUyPzvE2b/gihHE+ Vucg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz3ByYtxoaaCS0lvI+k3YaInyMak3A4c+ApHZ8dh1yagCjjKb5R rp62J0uNStqyctOTGpAAzYZg75o2Ob0ORJW5jq4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHblTU96aY47U3XhM6Mc5qYepYGQggrPnEFDCVmgeagFM+FvV3WNGqWpHMJfwCsWvo8NSfgPxUNQVILtGkODrU=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:c34c:0:b0:540:77f8:240 with SMTP id q12-20020a50c34c000000b0054077f80240mr3674547edb.14.1699539911163; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 06:25:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTv_DWvmygcSZXS4r3K87m=a0MLxL4i=O36M3YXpzAmRpw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTv_DWvmygcSZXS4r3K87m=a0MLxL4i=O36M3YXpzAmRpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 19:54:59 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTuhCFqLn3NXU_q0XoVCcwGRgaBuEO=JF1VaEtOLkCcakg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Italo Busi <italo.busi@huawei.com>, "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, Oscar Gonzalez De Dios <oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>, Anurag Sharma <ansha@google.com>, shiyan49@chinaunicom.cn, daniele.ietf@gmail.com, victor.lopez@nokia.com, Ricard Vilalta <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es>, karthik.sethuraman@necam.com, michael.scharf@gmail.com, "Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE)" <dieter.beller@nokia.com>, gianmarco.bruno@ericsson.com, francesco.lazzeri@ericsson.com, younglee.tx@gmail.com, Carlo Perocchio <carlo.perocchio@ericsson.com>, Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000afc3d60609b8f8b6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/bzEXAlRBC_OE1-wdeP0nFPcRz6c>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-21
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 14:25:13 -0000

Please note that we are still missing responses from the following
authors/contributors:
shiyan49@chinaunicom.cn
ricard.vilalta@cttc.es
karthik.sethuraman@necam.com
dieter.beller@nokia.com
francesco.lazzeri@ericsson.com
younglee.tx@gmail.com
olivier.dugeon@orange.com
oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com

Regards,
-Pavan

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:09 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for polling for (second) WG last call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> TEAS WG Chairs
> ps: Please note that an IPR poll was conducted before the first WG LC.
> The poll is being conducted again because (1) there have been a significant
> number of changes made to the document since the last poll and (2) there
> has been a change made to the list of authors.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email