Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-21

[Gianmarco Bruno <[e-mail]>]

Hi  Pavan,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Regards
Gianmarco

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 6:39
To: Italo Busi <[e-mail]>; Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT) <[e-mail]>; Oscar Gonzalez De Dios <[e-mail]>; Anurag Sharma <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Ricard Vilalta <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE) <[e-mail]>; Gianmarco Bruno <[e-mail]>; Francesco Lazzeri <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Carlo Perocchio <[e-mail]>; Olivier Dugeon <[e-mail]>; Julien Meuric <[e-mail]>
Cc: TEAS WG <[e-mail]>; TEAS WG Chairs <[e-mail]>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-21

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for (second) WG last call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs
ps: Please note that an IPR poll was conducted before the first WG LC.
The poll is being conducted again because (1) there have been a significant
number of changes made to the document since the last poll and (2) there
has been a change made to the list of authors.