[Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-02.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 09 June 2015 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BC51A88D5; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OtL0JMIYu7qk; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BEB1A886E; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.3.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150609153525.12012.93279.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 08:35:25 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/diPHo7weE2SaJhxLzxMMJEO5W0Q>
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Subject: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-02.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:35:26 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Performance-based Path Selection for Explicitly Routed LSPs using TE Metric Extensions
        Authors         : Alia Atlas
                          John Drake
                          Spencer Giacalone
                          Dave Ward
                          Stefano Previdi
                          Clarence Filsfils
	Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-02.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2015-06-09

Abstract:
   In certain networks, it is critical to consider network performance
   criteria when selecting the path for an explicitly routed RSVP-TE
   LSP.  Such performance criteria can include latency, jitter, and loss
   or other indications such as the conformance to link performance
   objectives and non-RSVP TE traffic load.  This specification uses
   network performance data, such as is advertised via the OSPF and ISIS
   TE metric extensions (defined outside the scope of this document) to
   perform such path selections.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-02


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/