Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-12.txt
Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Wed, 10 April 2019 17:06 UTC
Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD38120106; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpw12hQLir_Q; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B35691200EB; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 60530252CA0C1EBB31ED; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:06:36 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:06:35 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.136]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.61]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:06:29 -0700
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-12.txt
Thread-Index: AQHU6Z0EUKlEMO7MUU6nHhLyTnGaaKY1pSpQ
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:06:29 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173D111C67@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <155424135956.6387.1551126859534085567.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173D10E13C@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <00f701d4ebcf$4e409540$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173D1117C3@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <011b01d4efbb$4060de40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <011b01d4efbb$4060de40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.123]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173D111C67sjceml521mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/ei4SKwlh6VrIqjZAF622N6keM0Q>
Subject: Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-12.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:06:43 -0000
Hi Tom, Thanks. I think there is still some inconsistency as you pointed out. Please see inline. This should be it. I uploaded v.14 that incorporated all your comments. Attached is the new version notification and the below is the pointer for the diff. https://www6.ietf.org/rfcdiff/?url2=draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-14 Please let me know if any further fix is needed. Best regards, Young -----Original Message----- From: tom petch [mailto:ietfa@btconnect.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 11:37 AM To: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org> Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-12.txt Young (!) I remain confused. What I see is s.1.3 | te-kpi | ietf-te-kpi-telemetry | [This I-D] | | vn-tel | ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry | [This I-D] | YL>> te-kpi should be te-tel YANG Modules namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-kpi-telemetry"; prefix te-tel; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry"; prefix vn-tel; YL>> This is now consistent with s.1.3 IANA Considerations URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-kpi-telemetry URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-kpi-telemetry YL>> ietf-kpi-temetry should be ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry. namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-kpi-telemetry namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry Too many prefix, too many URI. And IANA Considerations - which is authoritative so I tend to look at first - must specify prefix but it does not YL>> Added: prefix: te-tel and prefix:vn-tel -------------------------------------------------------------------- name: ietf-te-kpi-telemetry namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-kpi-telemetry prefix: te-tel reference: RFC XXXX (TDB) -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- name: ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry prefix: vn-tel reference: RFC XXXX (TDB) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leeyoung" <leeyoung@huawei.com> To: "tom petch" <ietfa@btconnect.com>; "TEAS WG Chairs" <teas-chairs@ietf.org> Cc: "TEAS WG" <teas@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2019 6:21 PM > Hi Tom, > > > > Thanks for your interest in this draft and a good review for it. I really appreciate that. I think most of your comments are valid; please see inline for my response. > > Please see the diff file: https://www6.ietf.org/rfcdiff/?url2=draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-aut onomics-13 and let us know if there are still missing items. > > > > Thanks & Best regards, > > Young > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: tom petch [mailto:ietfa@btconnect.com] > > Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 11:51 AM > > To: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org> > > Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org> > > Subject: Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-12.txt > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Leeyoung" <leeyoung@huawei.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2019 10:56 PM > > > > > Hi Lou and Pavan, > > > > > > Following up the discussion from IETF 104 TEAS WG meeting, please find > > the updated version of draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-12. > > (See the attachment diff file). > > > > > > To recap: > > > > > > - The draft is "generalized" to be applicable in generic settings. > > (See Abstract/Introduction) > > > - Changes of modules: from ietf-actn-te-kpi-telemetry model to > > ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry model. > > > - Section 4 has been added (v.11) to explain what scaling in/out > > mechanism is with illustration and a partial YANG tree. > > > > > > We believe all pending issues/comments have been incorporated in v12 > > and as such the draft is a good basis for WG adoption. Please let me know if you have any further comments. > > > > Lee > > > > I am confused. I am looking at > > draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-12 > > > > In IANA Considerations you have > > URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-kpi-telemetry > > when the namespace is > > "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry"; > > and the prefix, which must be specified, is missing > > > > In the list of prefix I see > > > > | te-kpi | ietf-te-kpi-telemetry | [This I-D] | > > | vn-tel | ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry | [This I-D] | > > > > YL>> Thanks for the catch. I Corrected: > > > > OLD: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-kpi-telemetry > > NEW: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry > > > > 7.1 has > > namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-kpi-telemetry"; > > prefix te-tel; > > > > 7.2 has > > namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry"; > > prefix actn-tel; > > > > [perm any of 'actn' 'vn' 'te' 'kpi' 'tel' at random!] > > > > YL>> actn -> vn; ‘te’ is te-tunnel so it is clear; kpi is key performance index, so it is clear. I would change actn-tel to vn-tel to be consistent with te-tel. > > > > I do wonder about the choice of prefix. It seems to me that it is about KPI for VN and TE in which case, kpi-th- and kpi-vn seem clearer. I have yet to see the minutes of the meeting so am not familiar with the discussion > > > > YL>> I think te and vn are the base model to which these kpi modules are extended; thus, I think we would stick to ietf-te-kpi-telemetry and ietf-vn-kpi-telemetry. > > > > > > Also, > > > > There are a lot of lines that are too long for an RFC > > > > The YANG Modules lack version statement > > > > YL>> Added version 1.1 > > > > The YANG modules lack Copyright statement > > > > YL>> added. > > > > The YANG module lack reference statements > > > > YL>> There is no real external reference in this module. > > > > The import statements lack reference clause > > > > YL>> Added. > > > > There is no reference back from the YANG module to the I-D/RFC to tell users where it came from where to find out more. > > > > YL>> Since there is no real reference in the YANG module, there is no case for this. > > > > Several of the Informative References look Normative e.g. > > RFC6020 RFC7950 RFC8341RFC8309 RFC8233 RFC7926etc etc > > > > YL>> Agreed and moved these to Normative except 8233 as it is already in the Normative. > > > > The Security Considerations are out of date lacking RESTCONF, TLS, HTTPS > > > > YL>> Added. Please see the section. > > > > I suggest expanding VN in the Introduction; you do it in the Abstract and that is good but I, and some like me, skip straight to the Introduction. > > > > YL>> Done. > > > > Further on, I think that you need to expand SLA, BER - not sure about CAPEX/OPEX > > > > YL>> Will do that in the next revision. > > > > Tom Petch > > > > p.s. if in doubt, blame your fellow authors:-) > > > > > Thanks. > > > Young (on behalf of other co-authors and contributors) > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:43 PM > > > To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>; Satish > > Karunanithi <satish.karunanithi@gmail.com>; Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>; Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>; Daniel King <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>; Ricard Vilata <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es>; Ricard Vilalta <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es> > > > Subject: New Version Notification for > > draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-12.txt > > > > > > > > > A new version of I-D, > > draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-12.txt > > > has been successfully submitted by Young Lee and posted to the IETF > > repository. > > > > > > Name: draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics > > > Revision: 12 > > > Title: YANG models for VN & TE Performance Monitoring Telemetry and > > Scaling Intent Autonomics > > > Document date: 2019-04-02 > > > Group: Individual Submission > > > Pages: 25 > > > URL: > > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-au > > tonomics-12.txt > > > Status: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autono > > mics/ > > > Htmlized: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics- > > 12 > > > Htmlized: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-a > > utonomics > > > Diff: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-auton > > omics-12 > > > > > > Abstract: > > > This document provides YANG data models that describe performance > > > monitoring telemetry and scaling intent mechanism for TE-tunnels > > and > > > Virtual Networks (VN). > > > > > > The models presented in this draft allow customers to subscribe and > > > monitor their key performance data of their interest on the level > > of > > > TE-tunnel or VN. The models also provide customers with the ability > > > to program autonomic scaling intent mechanism on the level of TE- > > > tunnel as well as VN. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > > -------- > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Teas mailing list > > > Teas@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > _______________________________________________ > Teas mailing list > Teas@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas >
--- Begin Message ---A new version of I-D, draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-14.txt has been successfully submitted by Young Lee and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics Revision: 14 Title: YANG models for VN & TE Performance Monitoring Telemetry and Scaling Intent Autonomics Document date: 2019-04-10 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 28 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-14.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-14 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-14 Abstract: This document provides YANG data models that describe performance monitoring telemetry and scaling intent mechanism for TE-tunnels and Virtual Networks (VN). The models presented in this draft allow customers to subscribe and monitor their key performance data of their interest on the level of TE-tunnel or VN. The models also provide customers with the ability to program autonomic scaling intent mechanism on the level of TE- tunnel as well as VN. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat--- End Message ---
- [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lee… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft… tom petch
- Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Leeyoung