[Teas] rough notes from meeting

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 31 July 2020 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956C83A0A2E for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 06:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQqwc8qTR43v for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 06:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CC6D3A09E1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 06:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CMGW (unknown [10.9.0.13]) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E79175C33 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:04:49 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 1UiOkbxA2UY3D1UiOkF94i; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:04:49 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=O/RJhF1W c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=_RQrkK6FrEwA:10 a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=E1R-V3ATAAAA:8 a=55icsXYDAAAA:20 a=Y63TJ8Xx6N8gZ19rRBYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=BQiZhFUHZ1rCP-FNh-iw:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=oKWO0TA/F+FUgLhISFyE1shhObs7XtZSCeYd7wDS92U=; b=UF8XVhBXZdWeuYQNKTjw4lsuie BjTpepcebAqt/0TqSKiMPL/oIHJ1FzHciNm4lMHcORxtEM6yU5vp4IFfLrtczJ/a0Jn39VokURfak ik4i8DDSI5Wxn9u0DciicJIQP;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=43649 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1k1UiO-003wUv-ND; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 07:04:48 -0600
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <881740c6-5e91-047b-c084-ba5f004e6f09@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:04:41 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1k1UiO-003wUv-ND
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) [127.0.0.1]:43649
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/f102hfvE-B1yDO7V_J-caRwwN60>
Subject: [Teas] rough notes from meeting
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:04:56 -0000

All,

Thank you all for participating today! Please visit 
https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-108-teas?both and verify that your 
comments/discussions were appropriately captured.

Thank you!

Lou (and Pavan and Matt)

## TEAS Notes For IETF 108


## Session Information


                 TEAS Agenda For IETF 108
                 Version: Jul 26, 2020

                 Session 1: Friday, July 31, 2020 (UTC)
                 11:00-12:40 Friday Session I (UTC)


| |  |
| -------- | -------- |
|  Location:    | 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/floor-plan?room=room-6 |
| Materials:    | https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/session/teas |
| Meetecho:    | http://www.meetecho.com/ietf108/teas |
| Audio stream:    | http://mp3.conf.meetecho.com/ietf/ietf1086.m3u |
| Jabber:    | http://jabber.ietf.org/logs/teas |
| WG  ICS:    | 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.ics?filters=teas |
| Session ICS:     | 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/session/28181.ics|


## Presentation       Start Time     Duration     Information

## 1    11:00    5    Title:    Administrivia & WG Status
 > Draft:
 > Presenter:    Chairs

## 2    11:05    5    Title:    WG Draft updates
 > Draft:    Many
 > Presenter:    Chairs

Adrian Farrel: draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing has been respoon
Jie Dong: The plan is to move it to other documents (currently individual)
Eric Gray: The scope of the new documents are more narrow than the 
original so removal is problematic
Vishnu Beeram: Please discuss the change on the list
Lou Berger: Please discuss with WG before (re)moving text from a WG 
document

## 3    11:10    10    Title:    Yang model for requesting Path Computation
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-10
 > Presenter:    Sergio Belotti

Lou Berger: Suggest discussing/reporting any tool issues with the tool 
author -- (from jabber: report issue via https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang)
Rob Wilton (from Jabber):
   On the path computation presentation, and having looked at RFC 7950, 
for issue #76 (1) and (2) I think that the pyang 2.1 behaviour is 
correct.  I.e. don't include "input" and for (2), I think that this 
isn't allowed. The key text being section 6.4.1 or RFC 7950



## 4    11:20    10    Title:    Yang model update
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-04
 > 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-03
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-09
 > Presenter:    Dhruv Dhody

Tarek Saad: Is the path computed by "template" in TE-Service mapping, 
stateful in nature?
Dhruv Dhody: This is just the constraints and optimization criteria and 
nothing to do with the statefulness of path.
Daniele Ceccarelli: This comes from the OSS layer, which doesn't care 
about how it is provided via te tunnels, just that the service 
characteristics are met

## 5    11:30    10    Title:    DT Intro, IETF Definition of Transport 
Slice
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition-03
 > Presenter:    Jari Arkko + Reza Rokui
Actual Start Time: 11:42


## 6    11:40    10    Title:    Framework for Transport Network Slices
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04
     > Presenter:Eric Gray
 >
Actual Start Time: 11:53

Daniele Ceccarelli: in ACTN we have defined the interface between MDSC 
and CNC as a boundary between a customer and the operator. We are now 
lacking of a reference point between the MDSC and another entity within 
the operator. We have identified a similar issue in the context of POI.
On the MDSC role, I agree with the interpretation.

Lou Berger: Any objections to adoption?
     <none></none>
     Please expect an adoption call on list.


## 7    11:50    10    Title:    Transport Network Slice YANG Data Model
 > Draft: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-teas-transport-network-slice-yang-01
 > Presenter:    Xufeng Liu
Actual Start time: 12:10


## 8    12:00    10    Title:     A Yang Data Model for Transport Slice NBI
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wd-teas-transport-slice-yang-02
 > Presenter:    Bo Wu
Actual Start Time: 12:18

(From Jabber) Vishnu Beeram: Note that the previous presentation ties 
the modeling of a transport network slice to existing network topology 
models while the current presentation focuses on the service view of a 
slice. Please chime in with your views on these 2 approaches (either 
here or on the list).. There seems to be a case being made (by both sets 
of authors) to make room for both -- please discuss if you have any 
objections...
Lou Berger: Please take comments/discussion to list

## 9    12:10    10    Title:    Network Slicing with Flexible Traffic 
Engineering
 > Draft: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-teas-network-slicing-with-flex-te-00
 > Presenter:    Jeffrey Zhang
Actual Start Time: 12:26

Please take comments/discussion to list

## 10    12:20    10    Title:    Packet Network Slicing using Segment 
Routing
 > Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-peng-teas-network-slicing-03
 > Presenter:    Ran Chen
Actual Start Time: 12:31

Please take comments/discussion to list

## 11    12:30    10    Title:    A YANG Data Model for MPLS-TE Topology
 > Draft: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busizheng-teas-yang-te-mpls-topology-00
 > Presenter:    Italo Busi
 > Actual Start Time: 12:36

Please take comments/discussion to list

## Adjourn    12:40
 >