IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Review of draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-01

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 28 November 2016 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316621295C0; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:11:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VWmHAPfy15GT; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:11:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B62129F80; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uASI4HwW004852; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:04:17 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (206.131.51.84.dyn.plus.net [84.51.131.206] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uASI4F4k004833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:04:16 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Leeyoung' <leeyoung@huawei.com>, 'Daniele Ceccarelli' <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, teas@ietf.org
References: <035f01d2474e$a7bf9ee0$f73edca0$@olddog.co.uk> <AM2PR07MB0994F6A34D7CA79C4648FAC6F08A0@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A8E10A4@dfweml501-mbx>
In-Reply-To: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E172A8E10A4@dfweml501-mbx>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:04:14 -0000
Message-ID: <025701d249a1$d4e363c0$7eaa2b40$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKKvzRrQ1SYAQCr0IZhEuf5Xon9fALD1aj8Akr6muCfVUvF0A==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22728.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.122-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.122-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: zGP2F0O7j/s4HKI/yaqRmxMMmcrjEONd1kqyrcMalqW638ZUY6gSd4IW PSi3YJYO4KPOz6vzCM0LO4ro5BO0/LgSigd+50ba5gCHftmwEML66wd4gAR1X1pbYq2f4jz+sUx OWMsTCHKGpSgF5WX4PtpXuHW0tHwVe6k6FRH8ATy1PiMh4ZF39UGV2YNiPCWmuL1xlWnw0L+pFN yKpJLb40DXsqRsiis04gYlnr6q/ytNfs8n85Te8v7E6GNqs6ceavP8b9lJtWr6C0ePs7A07Vg3w wZ5miMrFT2L//d4qa48vE0jDDWwMqn6AeBpyT+dtrgFAezAVubyH92O+PZlDkacJzVQOLAFj+jV S9q3Q6lJ3lWSo8uCahio7oYUlJSoh8f9+fd10RPkvmU7gj2frT4n7o4CNd3aodO9X0I+jcrAvpL E+mvX8g==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/gEhzmiMgL026HeVWvAh9CRDCXwk>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Teas] Review of draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-01
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:11:13 -0000

> I also thank you for your careful and useful review of the framework document.
> As Daniele committed for the revision, we will promptly make the changes and
> have the list know what changes has been made.

Great. I have the Requirements draft open in my editor for a similar review.

> In regard to your comments on the APs/VNAPs, I have the same question as
> Daniele's. Please clarify it. Thanks.

Correct document. I just fail to grasp the value of APs within the architecture.
They seem to sit on the boundary between a CE and PE and there is a 1:1
relationship between a CE-PE pair and an AP. 

But anyway, I don't think they harm anything.

Adrian
--
Support an author and your imagination.
Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales.
More Tales from the Wood - Eighteen MORE new fairy tales.
https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Wood-Adrian-Farrel/dp/1786100924
Or buy from me direct.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email