IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-18

Anurag Sharma <ansha@google.com> Fri, 06 May 2022 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ansha@google.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F16C159492 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2022 13:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -22.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-22.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUrjy66kVa8K for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2022 13:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B26EC157B32 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2022 13:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id p26so1095232lfh.10 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 May 2022 13:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=p7EAVmbtXRJOJbHYeYvM+/+No7CMEvN/cCIr/6NcRkU=; b=cxm4WcCGcytKYw+STi8O9/RBBOzXGiHBV1b94K/Oh8Rzk7g1jE2E+XArlkYGcbsqZ2 3yNhQ/MytyhrjfBuGtJarynIoUL9MdfBpefl33+Wq6+61Kn/XFK68ZRsn7qhv4lwbgKK FMxkjbvFXawdjDGYInZB48QVB1wTBPU6iAcUCQuYsleCT6hsF9dBXXyiNDwF3ePDSzSR VSZmOv91UG3xJQTwijN4HsjGGuWa+Ss2CSithitNdiAzJ+SE1rXpSILdrKvDru8SqXDo JmWIx0ZZqSQXQElzf0dHE3asxTBnYSNJ5CfA13CMder2RmLdGJOv5oy/S3Df2qFhB0Ok 58Rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p7EAVmbtXRJOJbHYeYvM+/+No7CMEvN/cCIr/6NcRkU=; b=0AKITS2ROfQCzMGBtRm9SXkbroPMCKA/8k6nL96fPXMc940JKQ4SLJ9yfa1EmpKWJh tANcS9Ka6/HZDaW2f4yJtoS/rdNg94RDLtNvs4FpRThjgSBrH/BETWaVPtGzkIij6PHn d529pN5X4tdDsN4verksSbO4j6AAoGxftbISvfiWIHoQaWg15jN174TSrhDdbjnT3R5Y eGkXif5DWUxbw7WF27DnL5Lv1Gj7B87l2FmMUa2wKnVTSUW1lMcLX4J8egHlZjClVQUt SV0sHvrsOwT6hSUek/PZNxGPhSjTphZPDEXK+oh3o0Bt1dFrxiizpg9zxB0zVSXcoaNJ IYTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532n/5KS4BbBZnssM3SGaXB2gTpgAgtvxkQr252xDGtTldYqPEag 6yuBKr1Q3q2ai/Png3YDcv65hdSvsPq1EcM2hPSxYg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJW2KxbDKmlAJGM3fwMEhBvZLl45+vp2uGNaamd4D4TIPK+DQ4ewsfy4WKokQg7Qx2mSsY4lyqBqWxZnHGEqw=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:504a:0:b0:473:b6da:52ee with SMTP id z10-20020a19504a000000b00473b6da52eemr3470716lfj.665.1651868087164; Fri, 06 May 2022 13:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTsTioj69oA8+6r2Skv2Oa4kAGRpa81UOjqvEUisfUKrRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHNjPM_7ADJhyJLFey9KpyPSNQNwppuA_XVH4JmT1Hqv-tRibQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHNjPM_7ADJhyJLFey9KpyPSNQNwppuA_XVH4JmT1Hqv-tRibQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anurag Sharma <ansha@google.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 13:14:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJFj48Jj+7G6kN_CSf4PsThFziNbrOkEZ55cHu3iYkcfAJjE7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Scharf <michael.scharf@gmail.com>
Cc: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Italo Busi <italo.busi@huawei.com>, "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, Oscar Gonzalez De Dios <oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, victor.lopez@nokia.com, Ricard Vilalta <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es>, karthik.sethuraman@necam.com, "Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE)" <dieter.beller@nokia.com>, gianmarco.bruno@ericsson.com, francesco.lazzeri@ericsson.com, younglee.tx@gmail.com, Carlo Perocchio <carlo.perocchio@ericsson.com>, Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008dd90005de5d82f3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/iZ35xYl_3z4uuczdTPoMEwIncu0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-18
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 20:14:50 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Anurag

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:21 AM Michael Scharf <michael.scharf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
>
> Michael
>
> Am Fr., 6. Mai 2022 um 19:23 Uhr schrieb Vishnu Pavan Beeram
> <vishnupavan@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Authors, Contributors, WG,
> >
> > As part of WG Last Call:
> >
> > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> >
> > Please state either:
> >
> > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> > or
> > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >
> > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> >
> > If yes to the above, please state either:
> >
> > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> > or
> > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >
> > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> > appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
> > please answer the
> > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> > stage until a response has been received from each author.
> >
> > NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> >
> > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> > and
> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Pavan and Lou
> >
> > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> > response.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email