[Teas] Status of draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Sun, 17 March 2024 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C519C14F681; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.206
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2tig6YdMJo3; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A9E7C14F680; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TyYZR4DVHz688yX; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:08:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.162.219]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E9451402C7; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:09:20 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm100007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.116) by lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:09:19 +0000
Received: from kwepemd100004.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.31) by dggpemm100007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:09:16 +0800
Received: from kwepemd100004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.31]) by kwepemd100004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.31]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.028; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:09:16 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Status of draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability
Thread-Index: Adp4vkDkmTvuKEWVSfOCWRzFbYcwkg==
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:09:16 +0000
Message-ID: <83f469ddc44b4bc888e13bf1823b1bcb@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.126.202.221]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_83f469ddc44b4bc888e13bf1823b1bcbhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/iiEi1lKqX733LrG4ohXmJw-Sw4Y>
Subject: [Teas] Status of draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:09:27 -0000

Hi Chairs, WG,

Please find below the status of draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability:

Current status:

- Version 04 was posted to incorporate the comments and suggestions received.

- Added text to suggest that network slicing protocol specifications also include considerations of scalability.

- Some examples of network slice realizations are listed in an Appendix, and the possible scalability issues with each of them are discussed.

Open issues: none

Next steps:

- Collect and address further review feedbacks and suggestions.

- Move the document towards WG last call.


Best regards,
Jie (on behalf of coauthors)