IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pcecc-use-cases

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Tue, 31 January 2017 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B503012999D for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:52:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BjXpQp7M4t5e for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3831294AA for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:52:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17718; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1485877922; x=1487087522; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=s0TdyNb7Sd4kVvZzZM+1WEp/fKmRiI/nBSYxWH4HHkA=; b=fTmP6oj4VYB+CmSKE/25M5YbEPYdNyUL9gWEcH3LoNzg5QdDuRohmBVz PQAeEl+SVA6XXDJFpvj1J0ldpq0Jbg1elfHolNMHxxa70T0D7Op2c5apM eR2WQ5rpLNmwZz0BBH5LhzzSxOppRnCjfhKagj+m+QZ6KyML/MUtiWw+a Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BbAQCLsZBY/51dJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm85K2GBCQeDT4oJkgaICod+hSuCDSqFeAIaghg/GAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGkBAQEEIwpHBRACAQgRBAEBKAMCAgIfERQHAQEFAwIEDgUIiU4DFQ6oJYNRgiWHPQ2DaAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2GS4RvglGBTREBMx+CUIJfBZsfOAGGZocDhAuCAlOEQolqiieIVwEPEDh2VRU7hjl1AYV8gSEBgQsBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,315,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="379516816"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Jan 2017 15:52:01 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0VFq1m2012278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:52:01 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:52:00 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:52:00 -0600
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pcecc-use-cases
Thread-Index: AQHSc/UzO1djupr9pkmtdaTspKZZ36FRoSIAgADBEQCAAGm3MA==
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:52:00 +0000
Message-ID: <ff622d7aa31b48c1a951ba302d268614@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvmsC9sVXw1F05buCUKYGm6hfOZ59OGK9orEdEoEbbq1g@mail.gmail.com> <1f53d7cf071b4cca92617a46c60d73cc@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <90C82223-664D-4E9C-A493-2228877ED410@telus.com>
In-Reply-To: <90C82223-664D-4E9C-A493-2228877ED410@telus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.193.133]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ff622d7aa31b48c1a951ba302d268614XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/jHUDvJkAbAwXQIQVjFTofg87nzw>
Cc: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: [Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pcecc-use-cases
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:52:04 -0000


From: Boris Zhang [mailto:Boris.Zhang@telus.com]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:33 PM
To: Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com>
Cc: quintin.zhao@huawei.com; kinghe@tencent.com; agulida@mts.by; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pcecc-use-cases

No, I am not aware any IPR


Thanks
Boris zhang

On 2017-01-30, at 5:05 PM, "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com<mailto:mhartley@cisco.com>> wrote:
Gentle reminder for those on the To: list: we’re still waiting on your replies to the IPR poll. The draft will not proceed until we’ve heard from all authors and contributors.

Please reply to the original thread in the TEAS WG.

Cheers

Matt

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 9:47 AM
To: quintin.zhao@huawei.com<mailto:quintin.zhao@huawei.com>; lizhenbin@huawei.com<mailto:lizhenbin@huawei.com>; khasanov.boris@huawei.com<mailto:khasanov.boris@huawei.com>; kinghe@tencent.com<mailto:kinghe@tencent.com>; chao.zhou@cisco.com<mailto:chao.zhou@cisco.com>; boris.zhang@telus.com<mailto:boris.zhang@telus.com>; arachitskiy@mts.by<mailto:arachitskiy@mts.by>; agulida@mts.by<mailto:agulida@mts.by>; lufang@ebay.com<mailto:lufang@ebay.com>
Cc: teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pcecc-use-cases

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
  appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email