[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pcecc-use-cases

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sat, 21 January 2017 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD78129ACA; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 06:46:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KH9sfL0kvl82; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 06:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22a.google.com (mail-ua0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071FA129AB2; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 06:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 35so82699716uak.1; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 06:46:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OuXPKprmt3KtVjjjkwAcc5JVvOuZ5TdN0exqCZd69S4=; b=DNei73+BaT3huh2TmtWs/G9QWUBLPdvLTBMBeScBBUminkpPt+LBHoEpd7MnbA8YlE FZzj7Cbhe9Ecov4TPc+hZBx5mj1g9Np9hpfRR82pOPrMhVUw/eTHYMdqUm1U/lr+jtTB 8AKo56x6Bz6q9IkAxIMgTTt/ddNEqANq4stZ8fsS0WLz7g+cfrUpcDSL/FJfVLlVdR5k z3zlXd2qK7IjJpFE2Fh7GyipvddzRbcytMMQfQVBuRobltfh4FJPBpH/BIhr4jbmzlKj b/SotjIowBptESXcXO144B6h7q2HF1tHTX5zDTn5hTwdYMTV5oNmqpyMkAMdiSYitpxC O3RA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OuXPKprmt3KtVjjjkwAcc5JVvOuZ5TdN0exqCZd69S4=; b=DbZQcqJfnKLwKfe1WVAlJzhLpMzG+8gsJhuqu54gvpN5JkL7U/cdDTaSRnvyEC7zkw cFNe4E+l6sUi3goT2xrS12VQh64QSZ5hNsZQzdMzIXgweEPmWtEW79WsyRggRAHFrK/W tCQF3i4yI5exgr2flUM2T4jlUMT9na3XT4KIDiXqVVzvB1EjscyGo+fEuMtc+dKBrsjz kyX4j9neinS8vqWeh9+NZOnowfBnHsdW1nbxuXczg5oITH2RetebKU539t1tzxhs7L7a UYz+Zkhc0BaIWE/YL/D3Jddif4e5eECWNiKJEOWE5Hla5fQcDxOBZepO2DSL4SpdmvbB rL+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL7XJeAdDv8QYj9vfFV7uKc+lQwNOU7FXG4+FGS7SMCmK0uix5l+YHYa2h9SlFF3wArgKxBclv8aN5B+Q==
X-Received: by 10.159.49.21 with SMTP id m21mr10990309uab.179.1485010006053; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 06:46:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.159.20 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 06:46:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 09:46:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTvmsC9sVXw1F05buCUKYGm6hfOZ59OGK9orEdEoEbbq1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: quintin.zhao@huawei.com, lizhenbin@huawei.com, khasanov.boris@huawei.com, kinghe@tencent.com, chao.zhou@cisco.com, boris.zhang@telus.com, arachitskiy@mts.by, agulida@mts.by, lufang@ebay.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045ddad8e61ab305469bd58c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/oy5wSW2WPhUXPCe834TiAyaGo8Y>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pcecc-use-cases
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 14:46:48 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
  appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou