IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Drafts on slicing in SR networks

chen.ran@zte.com.cn Tue, 17 November 2020 02:19 UTC

Return-Path: <chen.ran@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790C23A09A4; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:19:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mo_e6fEjSBEP; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:19:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DA643A098E; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:19:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.217]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id E68B3345DFFAD07FC8DD; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:19:34 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 431C7FC8D1765962445E; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:19:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp04.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.203]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 0AH2JIQq073671; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:19:18 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from chen.ran@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp05[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:19:17 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:19:17 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afd5fb3332501de2265
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202011171019173134903@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <d2164756-fa54-b812-8fd9-81816c2833e1@labn.net>
References: d2164756-fa54-b812-8fd9-81816c2833e1@labn.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: chen.ran@zte.com.cn
To: lberger@labn.net
Cc: draft-peng-teas-network-slicing@ietf.org, draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 0AH2JIQq073671
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/mvBgJYvPX04vRvKbu5tdAlV_N_8>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Drafts on slicing in SR networks
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 02:19:40 -0000

Hi Lou,


Thanks for your suggestion.  Let's take a look at draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet and look for cooperation.






Best Regards


Ran 







原始邮件



发件人：LouBerger
收件人：draft-peng-teas-network-slicing@ietf.org;draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet@ietf.org;
抄送人：TEAS WG;
日 期 ：2020年11月16日 19:25
主 题 ：[Teas] Drafts on slicing in SR networks


Authors,

     Apologies for the lack of time to discuss your drafts in today's 
TEAS WG meeting.  I note that both cover overlapping topics, i.e., 
slicing in SR networks.  Would it be possible/reasonable for the authors 
to try to work together to come up with a joint proposal for 
consideration by the WG?  I do note that one document is solely on SR 
with the other covers SR and non-SR usage.

Thank you,

Lou (as Chair)


_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email