IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-05

Jeong-dong Ryoo <ryoo@etri.re.kr> Thu, 18 February 2021 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353C53A1E77 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:32:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dooray.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kFpi-OeeX9Le for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mscreen.etri.re.kr (mscreen.etri.re.kr [129.254.9.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CBBD3A1E72 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown (HELO send001-relay.gov-dooray.com) (211.180.235.152) by 129.254.9.16 with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2021 09:32:37 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 211.180.235.152
X-Original-MAILFROM: ryoo@etri.re.kr
X-Original-RCPTTO: teas@ietf.org
Received: from [10.162.225.109] (HELO send002.gov-dooray.com) ([10.162.225.109]) by send001-relay.gov-dooray.com with SMTP id 239f1cb2602db5a8; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:32:40 +0900
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=foEAzPWHqV/7kLuyFRRkC4RfkoY2MAvHFpwG94oThNgnuYb8MC1zo/s0V/KVg2cwZv1Raelxfo tsiYvCnARv6hhQzSnwmVG5+Vj8LTmXP5xJk2M/qJvTtgnpTtBia6pMt46vbbLbwB0D1S5ydt4o0a 2nyDmaeZWaHSyzHC0QfefLMLogCBjpc4LTxm/U+LaRMxFAWOPNH28N8OSF9RfKJvCS20U1UGCe5J ruvx4S6mrrjjRpQ3Li5qRDQ0p9Q9vLZq927A6KI89PqF+tf/ecE9DxdpJYjY/IFdxnk1nVHcAQjW sWbVnf+LA5F5kyHrJ1G7s2cfyWrUdPZPwJbCW4Jw==; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=selector; d=dooray.com; v=1; bh=rhARjzNZq5CKBgc2SSU44cW1jORNzod30oHDy7i/D44=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID;
Dooray-Meta-Signature: UjRn92DyfyvYhCAdmM6wUKRmP7YK7jKLaLh9RDH6Ko95Ey4qRu/jx LNyMLQCv+lP6s915o7W1VucUCd+W2Cmmzb1Yz6hTpO6WkJGj6mVBaiigzlMafiLUfPLuVCEGghQD 6h4WyFM4T6X/sHqnf2tKykA6SRHVU9TsMbFTbRePlWgOfqN6u5M3J1tLyKOsroCakFzp4lMrxBDj qLl4dcMm+vf6FjpbbqqVfuX5zCyNfyg+kjelb3zJouvP7C4v1j5z+3M2u7qgRe8+G5UPfCl1v7M8 tD/mX8oZc3SDFIaylfOI+31yegaRQQbkWIWeMyAUhL1iQpWQiSDNLpHio79vA==
Received: from [129.254.197.129] (HELO 129.254.197.129) ([129.254.197.129]) by send002.gov-dooray.com with SMTP id 39b15127602db5a6; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:32:38 +0900
From: Jeong-dong Ryoo <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
To: hejia@huawei.com, Italo Busi <italo.busi@huawei.com>, 윤빈영 <byyun@etri.re.kr>, peter.park@kt.com, tochio@fujitsu.com, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <me0w766gl4g9.me0w766h6k1c.g1@dooray.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_246895_1313346270.1613608357089"
X-Dsn-Request: true
X-Dooray-Agent: mail-api
X-Dooray-Mail-Id: 2946954540208296393
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: Normal
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Sender: ryoo@etri.re.kr
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:32:38 +0900
References: <CA+YzgTv0_P4V51GgJoKtRH-D=PAr0nX7LQifPTyHvb8skStKig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTv0_P4V51GgJoKtRH-D=PAr0nX7LQifPTyHvb8skStKig@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/nFgC2tp6NyK_OQUAmdB-RUSfB3Y>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-05
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 00:32:45 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Jeong-dong Ryoo





-----Original Message-----
From: "Vishnu Pavan Beeram" &lt;vishnupavan@gmail.com&gt;
To: &lt;hejia@huawei.com&gt;; "Italo Busi" &lt;italo.busi@huawei.com&gt;; &lt;ryoo@etri.re.kr&gt;; &lt;byyun@etri.re.kr&gt;; &lt;peter.park@kt.com&gt;; &lt;tochio@fujitsu.com&gt;;
Cc: "TEAS WG Chairs" &lt;teas-chairs@ietf.org&gt;; "TEAS WG" &lt;teas@ietf.org&gt;;
Sent: 2021-02-17 (수) 21:35:50 (UTC+09:00)
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-05

Authors, Contributors, WG,As part of the preparation for polling for WG last call:Are you aware of any&nbsp;IPR that applies to the draft identified above?Please state either:"No, I'm not aware of any&nbsp;IPR that applies to this draft"or"Yes, I'm aware of&nbsp;IPR that applies to this draft"If so, has this&nbsp;IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF&nbsp;IPR rules(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?If yes to the above, please state either:"Yes, the&nbsp;IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF&nbsp;IPR rules"or"No, the&nbsp;IPR has not been disclosed"If you answer no, please provide any additional details you thinkappropriate.If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer theabove by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you areaware of any relevant&nbsp;IPR. This document will not advance to the nextstage until a response has been received from each author and listedcontributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THISMESSAGE'S TO LINES.If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listedas an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations underthe IETF&nbsp;IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you areaware of&nbsp;IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain fromparticipating in any contribution or discussion related to yourundisclosed&nbsp;IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed aboveandhttp://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.Thank you,TEAS WG Chairsps: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in yourresponse.
_______________________________________________ Teas mailing list Teas@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email