[Teas] Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls-17: (with COMMENT)

[Deb Cooley <[e-mail]>]

that works for me.

Deb

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 9:14 AM Krzysztof Szarkowicz <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Ketan,
>
> Yes, this is much better.
>
> Thanks,
> Krzysztof
>
> On 2025 Apr 3, at 15:05, Ketan Talaulikar <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> Hi Med/Deb,
>
> About this "won't age well" aspect, how about "at the time of publication
> of this document" ?
>
> Just trying to figure out the best way to go about this ...
>
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 5:32 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Deb,
>>
>> Thank you for the review.
>>
>> Please see inline.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Med
>>
>> > -----Message d'origine-----
>> > De : Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
>> > Envoyé : jeudi 3 avril 2025 13:40
>> > À : The IESG <[e-mail]>
>> > Cc : [e-mail]; [e-mail];
>> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> > Objet : Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-
>> > mpls-17: (with COMMENT)
>> >
>> >
>> > Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
>> > draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls-17: No Objection
>> >
>> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
>> > all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
>> > cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > COMMENT:
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Thank you to Joe Salowey for his secdir reviews.
>> >
>> > Introduction, para 1 and 6:  What does '(per 2025)' mean?  Should
>> > this be a
>> > reference?  Or is it actually a date reference? If this is a date
>> > reference,
>> > please consider changing it, as dates like this won't age well.
>>
>> [Med] aha! That's a snapshot, if you will. This was actually added in -17
>> to address a comment from Ketan to who complained that "existing" and
>> "widely-deployed"  won't age well (interesting to see how the same argument
>> is used here.
>>
>> >
>> > Section 11, NSC Auth, para 1, last sentence: Please replace with
>> > "The
>> > YANG-based management protocols have to use a secure transport
>> > layer such as
>> > SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], or QUIC [RFC9000].  The YANG-based
>> > management
>> > protocols also have to use mutual authentication."
>>
>> [Med] Good catch. Tweaked to be consistent with the wording in the
>> template after you review. Thanks.
>>
>> >
>> > Section 11, Data Confid, para 1:  Please add 'and other security
>> > features.' to
>> > the end of the sentence.
>>
>> [Med] Not sure to get this one. The SLE here is specifically focusing on
>> encryption.
>>
>> >
>> > Section 11, second to last para:  Either replace 'an attacker from
>> > within the
>> > transport network' with 'An on-path attacker', or change the last
>> > sentence to
>> > remove 'such an on-path attacker' with 'such an attacker within
>> > the transport
>> > network'.  I would also change 'make more damage' to 'inflict more
>> > damage'.
>> >
>>
>> [Med] WFM. All the changes can be tracked at:
>> https://github.com/boucadair/5g-slice-realization/pull/222/commits/2e8a8f2ad7e35dc2254f6072cd1798c579aa9240
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/boucadair/5g-slice-realization/pull/222/commits/2e8a8f2ad7e35dc2254f6072cd1798c579aa9240__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!AoZME5ZSqgdIB7yCg0GfL7cZDdZ8KpxiB7k8rl3EcWnRWTa1wsV1fN1eGJOe5xtU5SMIWuprRuvE9Qlc0rJqkzy_gw$>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
>> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
>> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme
>> ou falsifie. Merci.
>>
>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
>> information that may be protected by law;
>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
>> delete this message and its attachments.
>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
>> been modified, changed or falsified.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Teas mailing list -- [e-mail]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>
>
>