IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] Action needed [Was: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14]

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 10 October 2022 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D8AC14F721 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 02:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XY8mGw-Jc44O for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 02:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9208DC14F724 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 02:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 29A9T5cU016339; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:29:05 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442304604A; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:29:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E2E46043; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:29:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:29:05 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-71-56-177.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.71.56.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 29A9T4Wv029101 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:29:04 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, 'Xufeng Liu' <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>, 'Eric Gray' <ewgray2k@gmail.com>, ewgray@GraIyMage.com
Cc: teas@ietf.org
References: <CA+YzgTu76Czai8EnE8ErQYnqugrCAcBj5E195CTazapk2kwHCA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTu76Czai8EnE8ErQYnqugrCAcBj5E195CTazapk2kwHCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:29:05 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <006d01d8dc8a$be368030$3aa38090$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006E_01D8DC93.1FFF7C10"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: Adjcire4ToxsALnQQvOJe3ogtLm/iQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 82.71.56.177
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27192.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--26.104-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--26.104-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27192.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--26.103800-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: LzuiTVrFB3gZnuop9luYIDjNGpWCIvfTkYC3rjkUXRIxN7CM2Nlzz0hX 5vohrcKBkwsVGHft1j2X9zdZvCdva7a2Vh2jQ2eEYy6AtAy7YZc2LwvzxRX0gNJlNvz/6/RNd6/ V+Rujlp5PhG4AaW+hAGQWFmLx3kGAkTllE5g6wzr7IK6Q1+r9nurPfTfiUUDuBKZk397vK6Xv5t G5qQwjQISO7r44vJ4rlMtJtrzrXTBJsyjYmmAr9De9MF4SNA1+tOtXYgbXjdfe6dEbvIyrxUnyB yhDYpu+X9t4w91/vra6lkhhsb0M/E9BZuh0bHXP71Wx2uUbPLdDr8MVm6DK3Vti/oq364XY9Tva dhXG9g3gPqVbzYllURvzEjY4Pdnt7IPLxXyVNZRkGI+vgRTxMFGk5uRH0MzCR6RHdVK85hXaOBW aEqUPGKofXa4f40fCVCHlgT24MfuDPJ3sg13mJ+5CGMbmjumUuKAG4OMlyf+OHxbnkniIp3XqhK 5FYYDpEltmTBYDkdgIek19m81B5lOi9a5lapaRNmg1ckxsf6cl3afZehJEWasI54YXVleneUQNv U47zugjRJR00ZWKiQHHM7DrYG5IkfRhdidsajMURSScn+QSXlkMvWAuahr8uyVIYkGHAwpheV+c rsE6IfAxRSAc0OENIuJieNVvzvp+3BndfXUhXQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/qLGKLiDoEip4Mei4PZFtF_4pGj8>
Subject: [Teas] Action needed [Was: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14]
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:29:14 -0000

Hi,

 

Just chasing you on the IPR poll for this draft.

 

Thanks,

Adrian

 

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> 
Sent: 21 September 2022 17:08
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>; Rokui, Reza <rrokui@ciena.com>; shunsuke.homma.ietf@gmail.com; Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>; LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; ewgray@graiymage.com; Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>; mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>; Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14

 

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG last call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

ps: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email