IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-05.txt

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 11 February 2024 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1891C14F5EA; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 04:03:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.805
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.805 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PI5JNT0T9XQK; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 04:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1481C14F5E8; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 04:03:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 41BC3N5a006494; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:03:23 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A86E4604B; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:03:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A4046048; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:03:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:03:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([148.252.140.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 41BC3H1H032340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:03:20 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing@ietf.org
Cc: 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
References: <170765270719.35223.5479550819486697722@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <170765270719.35223.5479550819486697722@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:03:17 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <07b401da5ce2$4fc6e4d0$ef54ae70$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHW5qmEWaHUVlVTs1hQi+4Oi/T9urEL9qRg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 148.252.140.125
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=Rer/WbiewB+hjn6yYYedpODsXgrFUFGnPLD9bbq4eLM=; b=0Iz QAJSbFvGjn3CrU5le3IOeZxalfiOOtmc4Ox5yl4A4xHoFVQBPB6ZfSKzOJfbBAob V2DQRzWjzTI0Tlp5b1/95PIxZfrNnZopbfVv6CuMawYFUoxY3HuzVr8gne/hmJ1i Rjd4qYACY6Igb2Leu29fsrhdby21oHLJ0XdNdfBhSKr+Xs+zzXhs3fPf4WvW1QSK iONccbj20VRgM77V5OabozzYnQzXddmvLyc2sFo1P1asfZ9bmcGd/LXsBWQtgdHT FrV8khosScCy2ifOkAmgXqHHr6JUEYNFct1VAUUwFUfW8kqmpBTsRfoE/u+akx4H GbP8fwli0HrwJQ69cZQ==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28184.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--9.846-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--9.846-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28184.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--9.845600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 8+bhjh9TQnHxIbpQ8BhdbMQ4mpKyfkqZ2cFpF8tDGzivloAnGr4qhqpi ajkNjqhDWrcHS92GiV6RF346X4zr7Odv6cWcdrc0lVHM/F6YkvREw6TMAn62uztMi3DI7t4fAq/ SSAVn/GI+xqBYr7akxbQeFj3sWOU1TeDXE9iDua4EClJgjzpjqBEqtvCB4RTiY8r/ndGdDsX+qa nZgLWi0DCzXM7l69kZXWMWwXFmFkWu2UwXiL25LkWX0DfhVamw9pLnYtQ99xLDqO6/8R69QAboT DS3zulAUVvRHf/Et9NgBKW7UCfQnl99f72h8BYfuFdP7vaalM1WVhQUGtfjX0Jv2xLgykjPo8WM kQWv6iV95l0nVeyiuJFawlPPN5Z+U6baA36eiazEQdG7H66TyH4gKq42LRYk1UaO7EvJAZu7oLH PDjTSNaPLLH+lGlJnLtp8fmDrIYl+3BndfXUhXQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/sLqFPtjT3vx9TES6jVk0PSCqdkM>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-05.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:03:35 -0000

Hi chairs,

Just a reminder that this draft is just spinning waiting for WG last call
after we resolved the discussion with Pavan about whether this draft should
"merge" with other I-Ds.

This revision is  keepalive, changes John's coordinates, and fixes a typo.

Cheers,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: 11 February 2024 11:58
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Subject: [Teas] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-05.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-05.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
Signaling (TEAS) WG of the IETF.

   Title:   Applicability of Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered
Networks (ACTN) to Network Slicing
   Authors: Daniel King
            John Drake
            Haomian Zheng
            Adrian Farrel
   Name:    draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-05.txt
   Pages:   24
   Dates:   2024-02-11

Abstract:

   Network abstraction is a technique that can be applied to a network
   domain to obtain a view of potential connectivity across the network
   by utilizing a set of policies to select network resources.

   Network slicing is an approach to network operations that builds on
   the concept of network abstraction to provide programmability,
   flexibility, and modularity.  It may use techniques such as Software
   Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) to
   create multiple logical or virtual networks, each tailored for a set
   of services that share the same set of requirements.

   Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) is
   described in RFC 8453.  It defines an SDN-based architecture that
   relies on the concept of network and service abstraction to detach
   network and service control from the underlying data plane.

   This document outlines the applicability of ACTN to network slicing
   in a Traffic Engineered (TE) network that utilizes IETF technologies.
   It also identifies the features of network slicing not currently
   within the scope of ACTN, and indicates where ACTN might be extended.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-0
5.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn
-slicing-05

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email