[Teas] Minor update to draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 11 September 2022 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D31C1524DC for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 14:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IjdNYvXa4me7 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 14:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9CC7C14F692 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 14:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 28BLcVxM000364 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 22:38:31 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0114604A for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 22:38:31 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B0746043 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 22:38:31 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 22:38:31 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (152.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.152] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 28BLcUPo004616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 22:38:31 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 22:38:30 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <008201d8c626$d6a98380$83fc8a80$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdjGImkaJiw4KwUCTReuYddQknmO2g==
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.152
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27136.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.422-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.422-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27136.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.421800-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: gn3Lr6Weh22DzxBiMzl9uazSsZt54aj7stmlQezwoxXVjNsehGf0vZXw t1rkqwjUDH+wnviyBXaK1ER6Kzgw0foV0U8Wf4NeCtzGvPCy/m5hv+ctX+VuT7KeTtOdjMy6zvS B/1+4feSDWOP5mnnB+QcxJ7EWCZcOGAdnzrnkM485f9Xw/xqKXcidYBYDjITpi2QFaYS1v20qtq 5d3cxkNTPrzw6uzp2wQsvcCp2cXHifmA1CqvdCmaJdSRniLQSsLhj0AfjWbF4=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/yEayTrqiUHUSq4LMVetYsVoGYMQ>
Subject: [Teas] Minor update to draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 21:38:39 -0000

Hi all,

Just had an email exchange with Dirk von Hugo that results in the following
change to Section 5.1.1.4 of our draft.

OLD
   With QUIC it is possible to support the ATSSS switching and steering
   functions, but splitting is not yet supported.  Indeed, QUIC supports
   a connection migration procedure that allows peers to change their
   transport coordinates (IP addresses, port numbers) without breaking
   the underlying QUIC connection.
NEW
   With QUIC it is possible to support the ATSSS switching and steering
   functions.  Indeed, QUIC supports a connection migration procedure
   that allows peers to change their transport coordinates (IP addresses,
   port numbers) without breaking the underlying QUIC connection.
   While no support for ATSSS splitting has yet been developed for QUIC,
   extensions to Multipath Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (MP-DCCP) 
   [RFC4340] to provide support for splitting data traffic of UDP and plain
   IP flows across multiple paths on a per-packet level can be found in 
   [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp].
END

Best,
Adrian