Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06.txt

Jeong-dong Ryoo <ryoo@etri.re.kr> Sun, 25 April 2021 05:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7E43A2F8E for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dooray.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HP-qbdejbRL for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mscreen.etri.re.kr (mscreen.etri.re.kr [129.254.9.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B64763A2F8D for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO send002-relay.gov-dooray.com) (211.180.235.153) by 129.254.9.16 with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2021 14:07:08 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 211.180.235.153
X-Original-MAILFROM: ryoo@etri.re.kr
X-Original-RCPTTO: teas@ietf.org
Received: from [10.162.225.103] (HELO send001.gov-dooray.com) ([10.162.225.103]) by send002-relay.gov-dooray.com with SMTP id 650cd3d46084f905; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:07:17 +0900
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=m9NWetGbwfpAZUmofqyKgQbKS/UqryzVnVQNM5fMvNsT5AF4lYTzkaqmxkMDO6mZ4NFkJ/Urtl 8ekA/vPKqvSaiwemYjNwknETiSYy8pKYnXlSqT7olKP3GrGgnL3a17ov583m1oFMaVb65uG6p1KQ mTiDh8+5/o1If84G2F2QS90e1JEDEq7Q4175VoPNuCCIfzSe7vJwG7z+eybQj6Olp/ny+7YREHXO 1smHuJVSe/rTDk64YkI5+KJuSQrU3w0ckrAjKC1Crww1vF4zYDS3dzj2tWCDVATavUn+58lSZdZB aJNDvR+qi+fkR1E4nIp06VqS70ouWeyYnFly8Rzw==; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=selector; d=dooray.com; v=1; bh=UcW555PA4pQ5dULrvBXDmMcop7KMB5mxn548HMOlPIc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID;
Dooray-Meta-Signature: Oks5z6wHi1Te0KJBndpKG2ywA+brUD1OL8KrpV4+zuGvjGsYTePYe DJ5nkqb7YBw6s915o7W1VucUCd+W2Cmmzb1Yz6hTpO6WkJGj6mVBaiigzlMafiLUfPLuVCEGghQD 6h4WyFM4T6X/sHqnf2tKykA6SRHVU9TsMbFTbRePlWgOfqN6u5M3J1tLyKOsroCZVCY/Z8ynKZY/ YdZen1PTAcvXEsNKxrmsAGZoNLtcl2g+kjelb3zJouvP7C4v1j5z+3M2u7qgRe8+G5UPfCl1v7M8 tD/mX8oZc3SDFIaylfOI+31yegaRQQbkWIWeMyA6RVgJr68i5gAPanEhgNYVgWzZhkPIz0jYs6ZW c5QsKw=
Received: from [129.254.197.129] (HELO 129.254.197.129) ([129.254.197.129]) by send001.gov-dooray.com with SMTP id cd29c2a56084f905; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:07:17 +0900
From: Jeong-dong Ryoo <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
To: teas@ietf.org, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <mr58aaidue6b.mr58aaichdql.g1@dooray.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Dsn-Request: true
X-Dooray-Agent: mail-api
X-Dooray-Mail-Id: 2994924937595287619
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: Normal
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Sender: ryoo@etri.re.kr
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 14:07:16 +0900 (KST)
References: <161932479768.12603.13540099941071881955@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161932479768.12603.13540099941071881955@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/yOzZHirCwHNyMqTzh19fiik0m7U>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 05:07:29 -0000

Dear TEAS WG Chairs and participants, 

A new version of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp has been uploaded. 

The authors of this draft believe that all the comments from Adrian raised during the WG Last Call have been resolved. 

A DIFF is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-05&url2=draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06&difftype=--html

If you have any further comments or feedback, please let us know. 
Otherwise, we would be grateful if the WG Chairs could take this document to the next step.

Best Regards, 

Jeong-dong (on behalf of co-authors)




-----Original Message-----
From:  "" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
To:      <i-d-announce@ietf.org>rg>; 
Cc:      <teas@ietf.org>rg>; 
Sent:  2021-04-25 (일) 13:27:06 (UTC+09:00)
Subject: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling WG of the IETF.

        Title           : GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Shared Mesh Protection
        Authors         : Jia He
                          Italo Busi
                          Jeong-dong Ryoo
                          Bin Yeong Yoon
                          Peter Park
	Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06.txt
	Pages           : 12
	Date            : 2021-04-24

Abstract:
   ITU-T Recommendation G.808.3 defines the generic aspects of a Shared
   Mesh Protection (SMP) mechanism, where the difference between SMP and
   Shared Mesh Restoration (SMR) is also identified.  ITU-T
   Recommendation G.873.3 defines the protection switching operation and
   associated protocol for SMP at the Optical Data Unit (ODU) layer.
   RFC 7412 provides requirements for any mechanism that would be used
   to implement SMP in a Multi-Protocol Label Switching - Transport
   Profile (MPLS-TP) network.

   This document updates RFC 4872 to provide the extensions to the
   Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) signaling to
   support the control of the SMP.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas