Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-06

["Joel M. Halpern" <[e-mail]>]

Given what you say, is the sentence needed?  It leads the reader to 
think these two things are more important.  (I am not objecting to the 
discussion under L2 technologies, just to this one sentence earlier.)

Yours,
Joel

On 7/15/2020 5:32 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
> Hi Daniele,
> 
> Thanks for your comment. Please see my reply inline:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 4:33 PM
>> To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
>> Subject: RE: Status update on draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-06
>>
>> Hi Jie,
>>
>> Just a minor clarification. In section 3.2 there is a statement saying:
>>
>> "The usage of such  (referring to TSN and FlexE) underlying technologies for
>> VPN+ service needs to be considered."
>>
>> This is not mandating the usage of TNS and FlexE as underlaying technologies
>> right?
> 
> No, they are just listed as candidate technologies which may help to provide the required performance.
> 
> Best regards,
> Jie
> 
>>
>> Thanks
>> Daniele
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Teas <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Dongjie (Jimmy)
>> Sent: den 15 juli 2020 09:10
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Subject: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-06
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've uploaded a new revision of draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-06. The
>> changes in this version are:
>>
>> 1. Some further clarification about the terms used in this document.
>>
>> 2. In section 4.1, the architecture figure is updated to better reflect the
>> relationship between overlay VPN service and underlay VTN.
>>
>> 3. In section 5.4, some further descriptions about SR control plane are added.
>>
>> 4. In section 5.6, text about the applicability of service data models is
>> simplified, as the details will be covered in NS-DT,
>> draft-wd-teas-transport-slice-yang, draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing,
>> etc.
>>
>> 5. Some editorial changes.
>>
>> As always, review comments and feedbacks are appreciated.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jie
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Teas [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
>>> [e-mail]
>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 4:47 PM
>>> To: [e-mail]
>>> Cc: [e-mail]
>>> Subject: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-06.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>>> This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
>>> Signaling WG of the IETF.
>>>
>>>          Title           : A Framework for Enhanced Virtual Private
>>> Networks (VPN+) Service
>>>          Authors         : Jie Dong
>>>                            Stewart Bryant
>>>                            Zhenqiang Li
>>>                            Takuya Miyasaka
>>>                            Young Lee
>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-06.txt
>>> 	Pages           : 35
>>> 	Date            : 2020-07-13
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>     This document describes the framework for Enhanced Virtual Private
>>>     Network (VPN+) service.  The purpose is to support the needs of new
>>>     applications, particularly applications that are associated with 5G
>>>     services, by utilizing an approach that is based on existing VPN and
>>>     Traffic Engineering (TE) technologies and adds features that specific
>>>     services require over and above traditional VPNs.
>>>
>>>     Typically, VPN+ will be used to form the underpinning of network
>>>     slicing, but could also be of use in its own right providing enhanced
>>>     connectivity services between customer sites.
>>>
>>>     It is envisaged that enhanced VPNs will be delivered using a
>>>     combination of existing, modified, and new networking technologies.
>>>     This document provides an overview of relevant technologies and
>>>     identifies some areas for potential new work.
>>>
>>>     Comparing to traditional VPNs, It is not envisaged that quite large
>>>     numbers of VPN+ services will be deployed in a network.  In other
>>>     word, it is not intended that all existing VPNs supported by a
>>>     network will use VPN+ related techniques.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn/
>>>
>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-06
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-06
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-06
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Teas mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Teas mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>