[Techspec] Post-edit tracking
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 24 May 2006 18:40 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyHp-0002gg-IR; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:40:49 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyHo-0002g2-IT for techspec@ietf.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:40:48 -0400
Received: from balder-227.proper.com ([192.245.12.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyHn-0007KA-5J for techspec@ietf.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:40:48 -0400
Received: from [10.20.30.249] (dsl-63-249-108-169.cruzio.com [63.249.108.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k4OIeg7I040366 for <techspec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2006 11:40:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p062309d3c09a5356ec6c@[10.20.30.249]>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:16:30 -0700
To: techspec@ietf.org
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Subject: [Techspec] Post-edit tracking
X-BeenThere: techspec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for IETF Technical Specifications \(BOF at IETF64\)" <techspec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/techspec>
List-Post: <mailto:techspec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: techspec-bounces@ietf.org
In section 3.3:
o Req-POSTEDIT-2 - All changes made to post-approval documents
should be tracked and the changes must be signed off on by the
appropriate technical representatives as defined in the IETF
processes.
Why is this a "should" instead of a "must"? For something as
important as changes made after the WG and IESG reviews, it would
seem that tracking and sign-off would be mandatory.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
Techspec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
- [Techspec] Post-edit tracking Paul Hoffman
- RE: [Techspec] Post-edit tracking Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
- RE: [Techspec] Post-edit tracking Paul Hoffman
- RE: [Techspec] Post-edit tracking Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)