IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR

Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU> Wed, 24 May 2006 18:44 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyLF-0004Fv-75; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:44:21 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyLC-0004B4-86; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:44:18 -0400
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyLA-0007XO-SI; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:44:18 -0400
Received: from gra.isi.edu (gra.isi.edu [128.9.160.133]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id k4OIghR04473; Wed, 24 May 2006 11:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
Received: (from braden@localhost) by gra.isi.edu (8.9.3/8.8.6) id LAA14710; Wed, 24 May 2006 11:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:42:43 -0700
Message-Id: <200605241842.LAA14710@gra.isi.edu>
To: housley@vigilsec.com, hartmans-ietf@mit.edu
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: braden@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ietf@ietf.org, techspec@ietf.org, ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
X-BeenThere: techspec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for IETF Technical Specifications \(BOF at IETF64\)" <techspec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/techspec>
List-Post: <mailto:techspec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: techspec-bounces@ietf.org

 
  *> That means if you have unlisted authors who have contributed
  *> significant chunks of text, you still need to get their clearance to
  *> do anything interesting with that text.
  *> 

Who decides what constitutes a "significant chunk"? 

Bob Braden

_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
Techspec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email